vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BOSTON OMAHA Corp (BOC) and Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caledonia Mining Corp Plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.9M vs $29.7M, roughly 1.6× BOSTON OMAHA Corp). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -23.1%, a 30.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs 6.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc's revenue compounded faster (17.1% CAGR vs 7.8%).
Boston Omaha Corporation is a publicly traded diversified holding company. Its core operating segments include outdoor advertising, surety insurance, residential real estate development, and fixed wireless broadband services, primarily serving customers across the United States, with a focus on driving long-term shareholder value via strategic acquisitions and organic operational growth.
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
BOC vs CMCL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $29.7M | $46.9M |
| Net Profit | $-6.9M | $3.3M |
| Gross Margin | 64.0% | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | -4.2% | 18.6% |
| Net Margin | -23.1% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.4% | 13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -228.1% | -33.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $29.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.7M | $46.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.1M | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.6M | $38.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-669.3K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.6M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.2M | $10.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.8M | $2.1M |
| Q4 25 | 64.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 66.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 66.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 67.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 69.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 67.5% | 41.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 68.2% | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.9% | 35.9% |
| Q4 25 | -4.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.7% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -16.2% | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.1% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | -23.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.8% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.3% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.0% | 5.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.09 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $56.8M | $7.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $25.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $516.1M | $231.0M |
| Total Assets | $713.1M | $339.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.05× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $56.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $68.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.6M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.1M | $15.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.4M | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | $25.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $516.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $528.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $531.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $533.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $532.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $527.7M | $231.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $530.5M | $231.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $536.2M | $220.3M |
| Q4 25 | $713.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $721.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $730.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $730.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $728.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $711.9M | $339.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $723.1M | $338.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $757.3M | $321.8M |
| Q4 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.05× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.05× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $17.9M | $4.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-10.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -33.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 93.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-17.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $17.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2M | $4.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-10.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-489.4K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | -33.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -9.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -39.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -23.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 93.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 115.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.97× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BOC
| Billboard Rentals | $11.9M | 40% |
| Equity Method Investment Nonconsolidated Investee Or Group Of Investees | $10.0M | 34% |
| GIG | $7.3M | 25% |
| Other | $608.4K | 2% |
CMCL
Segment breakdown not available.
