vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BOK FINANCIAL CORP (BOKF) and FIRST HAWAIIAN, INC. (FHB), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BOK FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($345.3M vs $225.9M, roughly 1.5× FIRST HAWAIIAN, INC.). BOK FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 51.3% vs 31.0%, a 20.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FIRST HAWAIIAN, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.1% vs 10.3%). FIRST HAWAIIAN, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($100.0M vs $-296.2M). Over the past eight quarters, BOK FINANCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (8.4% CAGR vs 4.8%).
BOK Financial Corporation — pronounced as letters, "B-O-K" — is a financial services holding company headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Offering a full complement of retail and commercial banking products and services across the American Midwest and Southwest, the company is one of the 50 largest financial services firms in the U.S., and the largest in Oklahoma.
First Hawaiian, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Honolulu, Hawaiʻi. Its principal subsidiary, First Hawaiian Bank, founded in 1858, is Hawaiʻi’s oldest and largest financial institution headquartered in Honolulu at the First Hawaiian Center. The bank has 57 branches throughout Hawaiʻi, three in Guam and one in Saipan. It offers banking services to consumer and commercial customers, including deposit products, lending services and wealth management, insurance, private banking an...
BOKF vs FHB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $345.3M | $225.9M |
| Net Profit | $177.3M | $69.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 66.2% | 41.2% |
| Net Margin | 51.3% | 31.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | 20.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.2% | 33.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.90 | $0.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $345.3M | $225.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $337.6M | $226.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $328.2M | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $316.3M | $211.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $313.0M | $188.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $308.1M | $210.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $296.0M | $204.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $293.6M | $205.8M |
| Q4 25 | $177.3M | $69.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.9M | $73.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.0M | $73.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.8M | $59.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.2M | $52.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $140.0M | $61.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.7M | $61.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.7M | $54.2M |
| Q4 25 | 66.2% | 41.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.3% | 42.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.1% | 40.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.9% | 36.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 56.0% | 34.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 56.2% | 36.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 71.3% | 39.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.4% | 34.3% |
| Q4 25 | 51.3% | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.7% | 32.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.7% | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.9% | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.5% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.4% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.3% | 30.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.5% | 26.3% |
| Q4 25 | $2.90 | $0.56 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.22 | $0.59 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.19 | $0.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.86 | $0.47 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.13 | $0.41 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.18 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.54 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.29 | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.9B | $2.8B |
| Total Assets | $52.2B | $24.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.78× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.1B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $52.2B | $24.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.2B | $24.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.0B | $23.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.5B | $23.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.7B | $23.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.1B | $23.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.4B | $24.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.2B | $24.3B |
| Q4 25 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-237.9M | $104.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-296.2M | $100.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -85.8% | 44.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 16.9% | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | -1.34× | 1.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $575.2M | $303.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-237.9M | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $867.8M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $89.4M | $136.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.3M | $36.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $541.0M | $113.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $246.7M | $58.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.5M | $78.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $179.2M | $66.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-296.2M | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $838.5M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.8M | $125.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-28.0M | $28.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $493.9M | $102.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.5M | $52.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $417.2M | $72.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.3M | $61.8M |
| Q4 25 | -85.8% | 44.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 248.3% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | 57.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.8% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 157.8% | 54.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 68.0% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 140.9% | 35.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.1% | 30.0% |
| Q4 25 | 16.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.1% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.1% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.9% | 2.4% |
| Q4 25 | -1.34× | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.16× | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.64× | 1.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.17× | 0.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.97× | 2.17× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.76× | 0.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.83× | 1.26× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.14× | 1.23× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BOKF
| Other | $148.2M | 43% |
| Brokerageandtradingrevenue | $42.4M | 12% |
| Transactioncardrevenue | $31.6M | 9% |
| Personaltrustrevenue | $30.6M | 9% |
| Trans Fund EF Tnetworkrevenue | $25.9M | 7% |
| Commercialaccountservicechargerevenue | $18.3M | 5% |
| Corporatetrustrevenue | $11.6M | 3% |
| Financial Service Other | $11.0M | 3% |
| Investmentmanagementservicesandother | $6.8M | 2% |
| Overdraftfeerevenue | $6.2M | 2% |
| Retailbrokeragerevenue | $5.4M | 2% |
| Investmentbankingrevenue | $3.2M | 1% |
| Merchantservicesrevenue | $2.5M | 1% |
| Automatedservicechargeandotherdepositfeerevenue | $1.5M | 0% |
FHB
Segment breakdown not available.
