vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DMC Global Inc. (BOOM) and Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. (HHH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($235.9M vs $143.5M, roughly 1.6× DMC Global Inc.). Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs -7.8%, a 11.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Howard Hughes Holdings Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.4% vs -5.8%). Over the past eight quarters, DMC Global Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-7.3% CAGR vs -13.8%).
DMC Mining Services is a mining services contractor founded in 1980 operating in Canada, the United States, Chile, and Mongolia
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc., formerly the Howard Hughes Corporation, is a real estate development and management company based in The Woodlands, Texas. It was formed in 2010 as a spin-off from General Growth Properties (GGP). Most of its holdings are focused on several master-planned communities. It took its name from the original Howard Hughes Corporation, which had developed the planned community of Summerlin, Nevada, and later became a subsidiary of GGP.
BOOM vs HHH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.5M | $235.9M |
| Net Profit | $-11.2M | $8.1M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -7.8% | 121.6% |
| Net Margin | -7.8% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.8% | 18.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3871.6% | -25.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.60 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $235.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $143.5M | $624.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.5M | $390.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.5M | $260.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.3M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.4M | $935.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $152.4M | $327.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $171.2M | $317.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-11.2M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.1M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.0K | $-12.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.0K | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $296.0K | $156.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-101.3M | $72.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $21.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 121.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 24.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | 33.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -97.7% | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | 20.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.0% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | -4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -66.5% | 22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.60 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $2.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.24 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $3.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.27 | $1.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $50.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $242.1M | $3.8B |
| Total Assets | $635.8M | $11.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $31.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7M | $493.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $596.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $400.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $436.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.6M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.8M | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $74.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $242.1M | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $253.0M | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.9M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $251.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.5M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.0M | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $11.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $635.8M | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.1M | $10.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $645.0M | $10.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $670.6M | $9.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $671.3M | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $702.0M | $9.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $869.5M | $9.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.20× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | $360.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6M | $149.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $177.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | $-224.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8M | $337.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0M | $248.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | $-17.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.6M | $348.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | $169.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $709.0K | $-238.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $317.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $238.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-204.0K | $-25.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 55.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | 35.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 65.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | -119.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | 73.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.1% | -7.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 60.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | 131.43× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.63× | -21.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.90× | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | -0.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BOOM
| Dyna Energetics Segment | $68.9M | 48% |
| Other | $57.0M | 40% |
| Nobel Clad Segment | $17.7M | 12% |
HHH
| Rental revenue | $113.5M | 48% |
| Master Planned Communities land sales | $99.6M | 42% |
| Other revenues | $11.0M | 5% |
| Builder price participation | $8.7M | 4% |
| Condominium rights and unit sales | $3.1M | 1% |
