vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DMC Global Inc. (BOOM) and PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. (PBYI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DMC Global Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.5M vs $75.5M, roughly 1.9× PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.). On growth, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (27.7% vs -5.8%). PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $9.6M). Over the past eight quarters, PUMA BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (31.3% CAGR vs -7.3%).
DMC Mining Services is a mining services contractor founded in 1980 operating in Canada, the United States, Chile, and Mongolia
Puma Biotechnology is a publicly traded biopharmaceutical company headquartered in Los Angeles, CA.
BOOM vs PBYI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.5M | $75.5M |
| Net Profit | $-11.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | -7.8% | 22.7% |
| Net Margin | -7.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -5.8% | 27.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3871.6% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.60 | $0.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $143.5M | $75.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.5M | $54.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.5M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.3M | $46.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.4M | $59.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $152.4M | $80.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $171.2M | $47.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $166.9M | $43.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.1M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.0K | $5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.0K | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $296.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-101.3M | $20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $-4.8M |
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 69.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | 77.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | 76.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.9% | 77.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | 76.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 63.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.1% | 77.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.4% | 75.5% |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -97.7% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | -5.3% |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.0% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -66.5% | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.60 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.17 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.24 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.27 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $97.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $50.6M | $22.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $242.1M | $130.3M |
| Total Assets | $635.8M | $216.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | 0.17× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.9M | $97.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.4M | $94.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.4M | $96.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7M | $93.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $101.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $96.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $96.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.4M | $107.2M |
| Q4 25 | $50.6M | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.5M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.7M | $45.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.4M | $56.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.8M | $68.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $74.2M | $79.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.1M | $90.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $88.0M | $102.0M |
| Q4 25 | $242.1M | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $253.0M | $115.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.9M | $104.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.9M | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $251.0M | $92.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.5M | $71.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.0M | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $409.9M | $51.0M |
| Q4 25 | $635.8M | $216.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.1M | $202.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $645.0M | $194.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $670.6M | $196.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $671.3M | $213.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $702.0M | $220.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $869.5M | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $860.0M | $214.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | 0.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | 0.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | 0.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | 1.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.20× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.21× | 2.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.2M | $14.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.6M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.7% | 19.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.0M | $41.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.4M | $11.2M |
| Q4 25 | $9.6M | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | $14.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $709.0K | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-204.0K | $1.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | 131.43× | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.63× | 1.21× | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.90× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BOOM
| Dyna Energetics Segment | $68.9M | 48% |
| Other | $57.0M | 40% |
| Nobel Clad Segment | $17.7M | 12% |
PBYI
Segment breakdown not available.
