vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DMC Global Inc. (BOOM) and PagerDuty, Inc. (PD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DMC Global Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.5M vs $124.5M, roughly 1.2× PagerDuty, Inc.). PagerDuty, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 129.7% vs -7.8%, a 137.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PagerDuty, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.7% vs -5.8%). PagerDuty, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($24.1M vs $9.6M). Over the past eight quarters, PagerDuty, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.9% CAGR vs -7.3%).
DMC Mining Services is a mining services contractor founded in 1980 operating in Canada, the United States, Chile, and Mongolia
PagerDuty, Inc. is an American cloud computing company specializing in a SaaS incident management platform for IT operations departments.
BOOM vs PD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.5M | $124.5M |
| Net Profit | $-11.2M | $161.6M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 85.3% |
| Operating Margin | -7.8% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | -7.8% | 129.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.8% | 4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3871.6% | 2827.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.60 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $143.5M | $124.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.5M | $123.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.5M | $119.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.3M | $121.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.4M | $118.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $152.4M | $115.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $171.2M | $111.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $166.9M | $111.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.2M | $161.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.1M | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.0K | $-7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.0K | $-8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $296.0K | $-5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-101.3M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $-28.2M |
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 85.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | 84.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | 84.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.9% | 83.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | 83.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 82.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.1% | 82.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.4% | 81.7% |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | -8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -97.7% | -13.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | -19.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | -30.1% |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | 129.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | -6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | -7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -66.5% | -9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | -15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -25.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.60 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.24 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.27 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.34 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $547.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $50.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $242.1M | $320.5M |
| Total Assets | $635.8M | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.9M | $547.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.4M | $567.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.4M | $597.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7M | $570.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $542.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $599.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $592.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.4M | $571.2M |
| Q4 25 | $50.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.4M | $484.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $74.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $88.0M | $489.5M |
| Q4 25 | $242.1M | $320.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $253.0M | $180.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.9M | $145.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.9M | $129.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $251.0M | $111.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.5M | $164.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.0M | $174.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $409.9M | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | $635.8M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.1M | $891.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $645.0M | $926.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $670.6M | $927.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $671.3M | $866.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $702.0M | $916.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $869.5M | $924.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $860.0M | $925.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | 3.73× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.21× | 2.85× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.2M | $24.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.6M | $24.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.7% | 19.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.0M | $117.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | $24.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6M | $34.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | $31.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | $28.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.4M | $22.2M |
| Q4 25 | $9.6M | $24.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $33.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | $30.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $709.0K | $30.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $21.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $35.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-204.0K | $28.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | $21.2M |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 24.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.1% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | 19.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 131.43× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.90× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BOOM
| Dyna Energetics Segment | $68.9M | 48% |
| Other | $57.0M | 40% |
| Nobel Clad Segment | $17.7M | 12% |
PD
| US | $88.8M | 71% |
| Non Us | $35.7M | 29% |
