vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DMC Global Inc. (BOOM) and Purple Innovation, Inc. (PRPL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DMC Global Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.5M vs $140.7M, roughly 1.0× Purple Innovation, Inc.). Purple Innovation, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -2.3% vs -7.8%, a 5.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Purple Innovation, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.1% vs -5.8%). DMC Global Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.6M vs $-7.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Purple Innovation, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.3% CAGR vs -7.3%).
DMC Mining Services is a mining services contractor founded in 1980 operating in Canada, the United States, Chile, and Mongolia
Purple Carrot is a Needham, Massachusetts-based, and 100% plant-based meal kit company. Founded by Andy Levitt, it offers both prepared meals as well as meal kits to subscribers weekly. As stated in a 2022 article in Cosmopolitan, “each Purple Carrot meal kit results in 72% less carbon being released into the atmosphere as compared to the standard American meal.”
BOOM vs PRPL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.5M | $140.7M |
| Net Profit | $-11.2M | $-3.2M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 41.9% |
| Operating Margin | -7.8% | -1.6% |
| Net Margin | -7.8% | -2.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.8% | 9.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3871.6% | 62.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.60 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $143.5M | $140.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.5M | $118.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.5M | $105.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.3M | $104.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.4M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $152.4M | $118.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $171.2M | $120.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $166.9M | $120.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.2M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.1M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.0K | $-17.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.0K | $-19.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $296.0K | $-8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-101.3M | $-39.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $27.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $-50.2M |
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 41.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | 42.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | 35.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.9% | 39.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | 42.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.1% | 40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.4% | 34.8% |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | -13.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | -13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | -6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -97.7% | -39.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | -19.3% |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.0% | -9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | -16.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | -18.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -66.5% | -33.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -41.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.60 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.24 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.27 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $24.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $50.6M | $126.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $242.1M | $-29.7M |
| Total Assets | $635.8M | $296.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.9M | $24.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.4M | $32.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.4M | $34.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7M | $21.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.4M | $34.5M |
| Q4 25 | $50.6M | $126.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.8M | $70.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $74.2M | $50.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $88.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $242.1M | $-29.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $253.0M | $-26.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.9M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.9M | $1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $251.0M | $20.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.5M | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.0M | $66.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $409.9M | $65.5M |
| Q4 25 | $635.8M | $296.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.1M | $302.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $645.0M | $303.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $670.6M | $293.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $671.3M | $307.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $702.0M | $309.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $869.5M | $362.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $860.0M | $382.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | 3.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | 1.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.21× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.2M | $-5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.6M | $-7.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.7% | -5.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.0M | $-41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6M | $-968.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | $-23.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8M | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.4M | $-16.8M |
| Q4 25 | $9.6M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $709.0K | $-25.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $101.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-204.0K | $-11.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | $-19.9M |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | -5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | -24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.1% | -9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | -16.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 131.43× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.90× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | -330.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BOOM
| Dyna Energetics Segment | $68.9M | 48% |
| Other | $57.0M | 40% |
| Nobel Clad Segment | $17.7M | 12% |
PRPL
| Cost Of Revenues | $81.7M | 58% |
| Other | $59.0M | 42% |
