vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DMC Global Inc. (BOOM) and LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($212.2M vs $143.5M, roughly 1.5× DMC Global Inc.). LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 18.8% vs -7.8%, a 26.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.6% vs -5.8%). Over the past eight quarters, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.1% CAGR vs -7.3%).
DMC Mining Services is a mining services contractor founded in 1980 operating in Canada, the United States, Chile, and Mongolia
LiveRamp Holdings, Inc., is an American SaaS company that offers a data connectivity platform whose services include data onboarding, the transfer of offline data online for marketing purposes.
BOOM vs RAMP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.5M | $212.2M |
| Net Profit | $-11.2M | $39.9M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 71.9% |
| Operating Margin | -7.8% | 18.6% |
| Net Margin | -7.8% | 18.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.8% | 8.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3871.6% | 255.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.60 | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $143.5M | $212.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.5M | $199.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.5M | $194.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.3M | $188.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.4M | $195.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $152.4M | $185.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $171.2M | $176.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $166.9M | $171.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.2M | $39.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.1M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.0K | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.0K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $296.0K | $11.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-101.3M | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $-5.4M |
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 71.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | 70.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | 70.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.9% | 69.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | 71.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 72.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.1% | 70.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.4% | 72.2% |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -97.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | -8.3% |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.0% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | -3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -66.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -3.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.60 | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.42 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.24 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.27 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | $-0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $403.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $50.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $242.1M | $962.3M |
| Total Assets | $635.8M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.9M | $403.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.4M | $376.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.4M | $371.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7M | $420.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $384.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $348.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $342.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.4M | $368.9M |
| Q4 25 | $50.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $74.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $88.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $242.1M | $962.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $253.0M | $943.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.9M | $947.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.9M | $948.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $251.0M | $957.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.5M | $932.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.0M | $951.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $409.9M | $949.1M |
| Q4 25 | $635.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $645.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $670.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $671.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $702.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $869.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $860.0M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.21× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6M | $57.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8M | $45.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0M | $55.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $9.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $56.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $709.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-204.0K | $-9.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -8.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 22.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.1% | -5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | 131.43× | -2.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.90× | 4.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BOOM
| Dyna Energetics Segment | $68.9M | 48% |
| Other | $57.0M | 40% |
| Nobel Clad Segment | $17.7M | 12% |
RAMP
Segment breakdown not available.
