vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of DMC Global Inc. (BOOM) and Xometry, Inc. (XMTR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Xometry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($192.4M vs $143.5M, roughly 1.3× DMC Global Inc.). Xometry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -4.5% vs -7.8%, a 3.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Xometry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.5% vs -5.8%). DMC Global Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.6M vs $-5.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Xometry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (25.2% CAGR vs -7.3%).
DMC Mining Services is a mining services contractor founded in 1980 operating in Canada, the United States, Chile, and Mongolia
Xometry is an online marketplace for sourcing on-demand manufactured parts for prototyping and large-scale production.
BOOM vs XMTR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $143.5M | $192.4M |
| Net Profit | $-11.2M | $-8.6M |
| Gross Margin | 17.1% | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | -7.8% | -4.6% |
| Net Margin | -7.8% | -4.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.8% | 29.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3871.6% | 12.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.60 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $143.5M | $192.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.5M | $180.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $155.5M | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.3M | $151.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.4M | $148.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $152.4M | $141.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $171.2M | $132.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $166.9M | $122.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-11.2M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.1M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.0K | $-26.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $677.0K | $-15.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $296.0K | $-9.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-101.3M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $-16.6M |
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 39.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.7% | 39.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | 40.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 25.9% | 37.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | 39.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.1% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 25.4% | 39.0% |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | -4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | -6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | -6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | -10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.5% | -7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -97.7% | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.8% | -11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | -14.6% |
| Q4 25 | -7.8% | -4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.0% | -6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | -16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | -10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -66.5% | -7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | -10.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -13.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.60 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.24 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-8.27 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.24 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.01 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.9M | $219.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $50.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $242.1M | $275.6M |
| Total Assets | $635.8M | $703.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.21× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.9M | $219.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.4M | $224.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.4M | $225.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.7M | $231.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.3M | $239.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5M | $234.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.6M | $240.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.4M | $253.8M |
| Q4 25 | $50.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $56.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $74.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $88.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $242.1M | $275.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $253.0M | $272.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $253.9M | $270.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $253.9M | $309.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $251.0M | $314.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.5M | $315.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $416.0M | $315.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $409.9M | $320.4M |
| Q4 25 | $635.8M | $703.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.1M | $698.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $645.0M | $687.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $670.6M | $690.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $671.3M | $680.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $702.0M | $678.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $869.5M | $678.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $860.0M | $692.5M |
| Q4 25 | 0.21× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.28× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.20× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.21× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.2M | $4.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.6M | $-5.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.7% | -3.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 5.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $37.0M | $-24.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6M | $5.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.2M | $-427.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | $-3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8M | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.4M | $-11.7M |
| Q4 25 | $9.6M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $709.0K | $-9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-204.0K | $-13.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.5M | $-16.1M |
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | -3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | -4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | -6.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.1% | -10.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.3% | -13.1% |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.8% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 131.43× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.90× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.24× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BOOM
| Dyna Energetics Segment | $68.9M | 48% |
| Other | $57.0M | 40% |
| Nobel Clad Segment | $17.7M | 12% |
XMTR
| US | $159.1M | 83% |
| Non Us | $33.3M | 17% |
