vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Boot Barn Holdings, Inc. (BOOT) and Dexcom (DXCM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dexcom is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $705.6M, roughly 1.8× Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.). Dexcom runs the higher net margin — 21.2% vs 12.2%, a 9.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dexcom posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.6% vs 16.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Boot Barn Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (34.8% CAGR vs 12.0%).
Henry Boot plc is a British property development business based in Sheffield, England. It was floated on the London Stock Exchange in 1919, becoming the first quoted housebuilder. Between the wars, Henry Boot built more houses than any other company. The company remains a significant construction and property management company operating in the UK.
Dexcom, Inc. is an American multinational healthcare company that develops, manufactures, produces and distributes a line of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems for diabetes management. It operates internationally with global headquarters and R&D center in San Diego, California, U.S.A. and manufacturing facilities in Mesa, Arizona, U.S.A.; Batu Kawan, Malaysia and Athenry, County Galway, Ireland.
BOOT vs DXCM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $705.6M | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $85.8M | $267.3M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 62.9% |
| Operating Margin | 16.3% | 25.6% |
| Net Margin | 12.2% | 21.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 16.0% | 21.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 14.3% | 153.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.79 | $0.67 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $705.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $505.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $504.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $453.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $608.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $425.8M | $994.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.4M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $267.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $85.8M | $267.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.2M | $283.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.4M | $179.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.5M | $105.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.1M | $151.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.4M | $134.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $143.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 62.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 39.9% | 62.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.4% | 60.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.1% | 59.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.1% | 56.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.3% | 58.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | 59.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.0% | 62.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.3% | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.2% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.0% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.4% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.4% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | 15.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | 21.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.6% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.3% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.9% | 13.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 14.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.67 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.79 | $0.67 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.37 | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.74 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.24 | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.43 | $0.37 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.95 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.26 | $0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $200.1M | $917.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $6.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $917.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $200.1M | $917.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.7M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $95.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.8M | $904.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.9M | $606.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $37.4M | $621.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.4M | $939.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $981.8M | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $6.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $209.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $148.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 21.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.44× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $89.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $209.7M | $294.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $25.7M | $659.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.8M | $303.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-43.1M | $183.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $157.1M | $301.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.8M | $199.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | $279.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $148.0M | $192.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-17.5M | $579.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.4M | $208.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-83.1M | $96.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $114.2M | $176.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-46.1M | $88.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.2M | $213.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.0% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -18.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | 15.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.8% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 21.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.6% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 8.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.1% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.4% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.44× | 1.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.61× | 2.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.38× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.15× | 1.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.09× | 1.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.26× | 1.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.06× | 1.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
