vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($395.6M vs $267.7M, roughly 1.5× Borr Drilling Ltd). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs 13.1%, a 10.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.1% vs -1.5%).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
BORR vs DLB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $395.6M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $94.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 88.7% |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 28.5% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | 24.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | 7.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | 3.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $0.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | — | $395.6M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $346.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $346.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $315.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $369.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $357.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $304.8M |
| Q2 26 | — | $94.9M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $53.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $53.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $91.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $67.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $58.6M |
| Q2 26 | — | 88.7% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 87.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 87.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 87.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 86.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 90.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 88.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.8% |
| Q2 26 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.2% |
| Q2 26 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.2% |
| Q2 26 | — | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $594.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | $594.7M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $644.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $644.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $702.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $699.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $626.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $520.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $482.0M |
| Q2 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5B |
| Q2 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | $147.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | 1.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | $147.3M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $54.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $54.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $472.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $67.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $174.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $106.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $327.3M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $50.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $435.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $61.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $297.2M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 142.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 45.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 97.5% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.8% |
| Q2 26 | — | 1.55× | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
DLB
| Licensing | $372.2M | 94% |
| Products and services | $23.4M | 6% |
