vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (ECO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($393.2M vs $267.7M, roughly 1.5× Borr Drilling Ltd).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. is a global shipping enterprise specializing in the operation of eco-friendly tanker fleets. Its core business covers maritime transport of crude oil and refined petroleum products, serving major energy and commodity clients across key international trade routes, with a focus on cutting carbon emissions via energy-efficient vessel designs.
BORR vs ECO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $393.2M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 41.4% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $393.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $308.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $-49.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $111.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $413.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $321.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $232.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $271.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | 101.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 52.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | 56.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 40.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $116.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $573.1M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $116.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $59.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $49.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | $92.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $573.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $428.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $410.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $432.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | $111.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $111.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $132.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $82.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
ECO
Segment breakdown not available.
