vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and Fat Brands, Inc (FAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Borr Drilling Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($267.7M vs $140.0M, roughly 1.9× Fat Brands, Inc). Borr Drilling Ltd runs the higher net margin — 13.1% vs -41.6%, a 54.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Borr Drilling Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.5% vs -2.3%).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
FAT Brands Inc. is an American multi-brand restaurant and sports bar franchise operator headquartered in Beverly Hills, California.
BORR vs FAT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $140.0M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $-58.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | -12.4% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | -41.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | -2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | -30.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $-3.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $146.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $142.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $145.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $143.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $152.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $152.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $158.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-58.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $-54.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-46.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-67.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-44.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $-39.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-38.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-26.2M |
| Q3 25 | — | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | -10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -27.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | -1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -2.0% |
| Q3 25 | — | -41.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | -36.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -46.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -31.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | -25.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -25.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -16.5% |
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $-3.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.73 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $-2.43 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.37 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-1.68 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $-585.8M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.2B |
| Q3 25 | — | $-585.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $-536.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-493.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-455.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-386.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $-338.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-296.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-255.9M |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | $-14.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-16.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -12.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-75.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $-14.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $-26.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-13.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-10.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-28.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-12.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-16.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-29.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-17.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-32.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-18.0M |
| Q3 25 | — | -12.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -20.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -12.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -7.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -16.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -21.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -11.4% |
| Q3 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 3.4% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
FAT
| Restaurant Sales | $96.6M | 69% |
| Royalty | $21.6M | 15% |
| Factory | $9.6M | 7% |
| Advertising | $9.1M | 7% |
| Franchisor | $1.5M | 1% |
| Other | $1.5M | 1% |
