vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD (GILT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Borr Drilling Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($267.7M vs $152.7M, roughly 1.8× GILAT SATELLITE NETWORKS LTD). Borr Drilling Ltd runs the higher net margin — 13.1% vs 4.1%, a 9.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. is an Israeli public company. It provides satellite-based broadband communications technology, its main expertise being the development, manufacture, and marketing of ground-based satellite systems for global communication via satellites.
BORR vs GILT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $152.7M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $6.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.8% |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 5.4% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | 4.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $57016808.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $152.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $126.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | $187.5M | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 22 | $105.3M | $98.2M |
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | $800.0K | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 22 | $-165.3M | $-5.2M |
| Q2 25 | — | 35.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.7% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | 29.6% |
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 23 | 31.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 22 | -116.8% | -4.0% |
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.4% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 22 | -157.0% | -5.3% |
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $57016808.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $56622204.00 | ||
| Q2 23 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-1.09 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $64.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $56.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $315.8M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $575.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $64.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | $93.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | $83.8M | $87.4M | ||
| Q2 22 | $29.7M | $70.1M |
| Q2 25 | — | $56.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $281.8M | — |
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $315.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | $906.2M | $255.0M | ||
| Q2 22 | $711.5M | $245.7M |
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $575.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $416.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | $3.0B | $371.6M | ||
| Q2 22 | $3.0B | $376.0M |
| Q2 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.01× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.40× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-8.5M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 23 | 3.00× | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
GILT
Segment breakdown not available.
