vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($403.4M vs $267.7M, roughly 1.5× Borr Drilling Ltd). Borr Drilling Ltd runs the higher net margin — 13.1% vs 2.0%, a 11.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.8% vs -1.5%).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. is an American sports holding company based in New York City.
BORR vs MSGS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $403.4M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $8.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 5.5% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | 2.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | 12.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | 641.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $0.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $403.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $204.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $424.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $357.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $53.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $227.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $430.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-14.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $25.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $37.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -69.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | -11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | 23.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 18.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -14.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $1.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.57 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $81.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $-282.1M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $81.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $48.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $144.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $96.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $107.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $52.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | $89.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $40.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-282.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-294.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $-281.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-283.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-273.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-277.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $-266.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-294.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | $32.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $31.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | 3.94× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-480.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $32.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-85.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $61.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-26.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $108.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $31.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-85.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $61.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-26.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $108.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -216.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -49.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.94× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 4.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
MSGS
| Event Related | $167.2M | 41% |
| Media Rights | $122.3M | 30% |
| Sponsorship Signage And Suite Licenses | $98.5M | 24% |
| League Distribution | $15.4M | 4% |