vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and ONTO INNOVATION INC. (ONTO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Borr Drilling Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($267.7M vs $218.2M, roughly 1.2× ONTO INNOVATION INC.). Borr Drilling Ltd runs the higher net margin — 13.1% vs 12.9%, a 0.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Borr Drilling Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.5% vs -13.5%).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
Onto Innovation Inc. is an American semiconductor company formed in 2019 from the merger of Rudolph Technologies, Inc. and Nanometrics Incorporated. It is a provider of process and process control equipment and software for microelectronic manufacturing industries.
BORR vs ONTO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $218.2M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $28.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 50.7% |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 10.9% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | 12.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | -13.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | -46.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $218.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $253.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $266.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $263.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $252.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $242.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $228.8M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $207.2M |
| Q3 25 | — | $28.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $48.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $53.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $52.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $35.9M |
| Q3 25 | — | 50.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 48.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 53.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 50.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 54.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 52.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 51.7% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 51.6% |
| Q3 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | 20.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 16.4% |
| Q3 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 17.3% |
| Q3 25 | — | $0.57 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $0.69 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.98 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $1.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $0.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $603.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $603.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $203.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $188.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $190.9M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $206.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.7B |
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | $83.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $82.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 37.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | 2.95× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $261.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $83.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $57.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $92.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $56.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $67.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $65.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $57.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $60.3M |
| Q3 25 | — | $82.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $44.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $83.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $59.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $50.2M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $48.1M |
| Q3 25 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 23.2% |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 5.9% |
| Q3 25 | — | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | 1.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 1.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.22× | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
ONTO
| Systems And Software Revenue | $173.8M | 80% |
| Parts Revenue | $23.9M | 11% |
| Service Revenue | $20.5M | 9% |
