vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Borr Drilling Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($267.7M vs $252.6M, roughly 1.1× PicoCELA Inc.). Borr Drilling Ltd runs the higher net margin — 13.1% vs -125.2%, a 138.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
BORR vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $252.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $187.5M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $105.3M | — |
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-316.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $800.0K | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-165.3M | — |
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -114.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 31.9% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -116.8% | — |
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -125.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | -157.0% | — |
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-1.09 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $456.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $83.8M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $29.7M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $281.8M | — |
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $354.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $906.2M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $711.5M | — |
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $3.0B | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.40× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-245.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-8.5M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-256.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -101.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 3.00× | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
