vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. (SKWD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($385.6M vs $267.7M, roughly 1.4× Borr Drilling Ltd). Borr Drilling Ltd runs the higher net margin — 13.1% vs 11.2%, a 1.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.7% vs -1.5%).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc. is a specialty property and casualty insurance provider offering tailored coverage solutions including commercial auto, general liability, professional indemnity, and specialty property policies. It primarily serves small-to-medium enterprises and niche industry segments across the United States, focusing on underwriting complex, hard-to-place risks for underserved client groups.
BORR vs SKWD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $385.6M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $43.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 14.2% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | 11.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | 26.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | 200.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $1.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $385.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $382.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $319.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $328.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $304.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $300.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $279.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $265.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $38.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $36.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $31.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $36.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | 14.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 17.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $0.93 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.90 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $168.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $1.0B |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $4.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $168.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $160.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $136.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $112.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $121.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $105.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $961.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $899.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $850.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $794.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $797.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $723.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $692.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | $408.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $402.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 104.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | 9.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $755.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $408.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $171.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $88.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $96.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $305.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $94.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $402.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $168.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $96.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $300.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $167.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 104.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 98.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 55.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | 2.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.30× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 0.68× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
SKWD
Segment breakdown not available.
