vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Borr Drilling Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($267.7M vs $137.0M, roughly 2.0× STRATASYS LTD.). Borr Drilling Ltd runs the higher net margin — 13.1% vs -40.6%, a 53.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Borr Drilling Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.5% vs -2.2%).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
BORR vs SSYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $137.0M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | -16.6% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | -40.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | -109.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $138.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $138.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $144.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | $187.5M | $159.8M |
| Q3 25 | — | $-55.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-13.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $-25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-26.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-47.3M | ||
| Q2 23 | $800.0K | $-38.6M |
| Q3 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.4% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 40.5% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 41.5% |
| Q3 25 | — | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | -18.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -17.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -26.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | 31.9% | -21.1% |
| Q3 25 | — | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | -18.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -29.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.4% | -24.2% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-0.68 | ||
| Q2 23 | $0.00 | $-0.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $71.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $852.5M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $70.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | $70.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $91.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $104.6M | ||
| Q2 23 | $83.8M | $144.4M |
| Q3 25 | — | $852.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $784.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $831.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $850.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $866.1M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $883.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | $906.2M | $923.2M |
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 23 | $3.0B | $1.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | $6.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-11.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-12.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.4M | $-23.2M |
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $789.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-15.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $-26.1M |
| Q3 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -9.3% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -16.3% |
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 1.8% |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 3.00× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
SSYS
Segment breakdown not available.
