vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and Trip.com Group Ltd (TCOM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Trip.com Group Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($304.6M vs $267.7M, roughly 1.1× Borr Drilling Ltd). Trip.com Group Ltd runs the higher net margin — 27.8% vs 13.1%, a 14.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
Trip.com Group Limited is a multinational travel agency headquartered in Shanghai, China. It is the largest online travel service provider in the world.
BORR vs TCOM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $304.6M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $84.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 78.8% |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 16.5% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | 27.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $304.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $242.7M | ||
| Q2 23 | $187.5M | $214.5M | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $100.7M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $82.7M | ||
| Q2 22 | $105.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $84.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $73.8M | ||
| Q2 23 | $800.0K | $12.6M | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $41.5M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $152.6M | ||
| Q2 22 | $-165.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 78.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 81.8% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 82.0% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 76.0% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | 75.5% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 23 | 31.9% | 26.4% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | -4.2% | ||
| Q2 22 | -116.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 41.2% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | 184.6% | ||
| Q2 22 | -157.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 23 | $0.00 | $0.02 | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 22 | $-1.09 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $10.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $23.8B |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $36.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $10.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | $12.4B | ||
| Q2 23 | $83.8M | $7.6B | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 22 | $29.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 22 | $281.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $23.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $18.1B | ||
| Q2 23 | $906.2M | $16.3B | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $16.3B | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $15.2B | ||
| Q2 22 | $711.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $36.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $34.2B | ||
| Q2 23 | $3.0B | $30.1B | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $27.8B | ||
| Q3 22 | — | $26.9B | ||
| Q2 22 | $3.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q3 22 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.40× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $380.0M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $-8.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | $308.0M | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 305.7% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 71.5% | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 3.00× | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | 9.15× | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
TCOM
| Others | $273.0M | 90% |
| Other | $31.6M | 10% |
