vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Verisign is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($425.3M vs $267.7M, roughly 1.6× Borr Drilling Ltd). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 13.1%, a 35.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Verisign posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs -1.5%).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
BORR vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $387.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $384.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $198.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $194.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 87.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | 68.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 67.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 50.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | $689.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $924.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $-1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $160.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $257.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $151.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $253.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 66.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
VRSN
Segment breakdown not available.
