vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BOS BETTER ONLINE SOLUTIONS LTD (BOSC) and Blaize Holdings, Inc. (BZAI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BOS BETTER ONLINE SOLUTIONS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.6M vs $23.8M, roughly 1.1× Blaize Holdings, Inc.). BOS BETTER ONLINE SOLUTIONS LTD runs the higher net margin — 8.0% vs -13.9%, a 21.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Blaize Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2377500.0% vs 34.6%). BOS BETTER ONLINE SOLUTIONS LTD produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.2M vs $-16.5M).
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that provides RFID and supply chain solutions. Its shares are traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market.
Blaize Holdings, Inc. is a technology company specializing in edge artificial intelligence computing solutions. It designs energy-efficient AI processors, low-latency inference software stacks, and end-to-end edge AI development tools, serving key segments including autonomous driving, industrial automation, smart cities, and edge healthcare monitoring.
BOSC vs BZAI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.6M | $23.8M |
| Net Profit | $2.1M | $-3.3M |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | 10.8% |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | -89.8% |
| Net Margin | 8.0% | -13.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 34.6% | 2377500.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 70.2% | 50.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $23.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-26.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -89.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -190.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -221.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.2M | $45.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.2M | $39.0M |
| Total Assets | $38.4M | $102.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $45.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $102.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $60.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.5M | $-16.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.2M | $-16.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.5% | -69.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.69× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-16.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-24.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-16.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-24.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -69.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -210.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.26× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.