vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BOS BETTER ONLINE SOLUTIONS LTD (BOSC) and Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gloo Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.6M vs $26.6M, roughly 1.2× BOS BETTER ONLINE SOLUTIONS LTD). BOS BETTER ONLINE SOLUTIONS LTD runs the higher net margin — 8.0% vs -116.9%, a 124.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. BOS BETTER ONLINE SOLUTIONS LTD produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.2M vs $-63.4M).
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that provides RFID and supply chain solutions. Its shares are traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market.
BOSC vs GLOO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.6M | $32.6M |
| Net Profit | $2.1M | $-38.0M |
| Gross Margin | 23.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | -82.0% |
| Net Margin | 8.0% | -116.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 34.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 70.2% | 12.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $-6.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $32.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -82.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -116.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-6.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.21 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $5.2M | $15.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $176.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $24.2M | $-444.4M |
| Total Assets | $38.4M | $206.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $176.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-444.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $206.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.8M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.5M | $-63.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.2M | $-63.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.5% | -194.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.69× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-63.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $320.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-63.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -194.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.26× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BOSC
Segment breakdown not available.
GLOO
| Platform Solutions | $12.7M | 39% |
| Advertising | $11.1M | 34% |
| Marketplace | $3.9M | 12% |
| Midwestern Acquisition | $2.7M | 8% |
| Servant Acquisition | $1.8M | 6% |
