vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Boxlight Corp (BOXL) and FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC (FEIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Boxlight Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($29.3M vs $17.1M, roughly 1.7× FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC). FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC runs the higher net margin — 10.5% vs -21.1%, a 31.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.3% vs -19.2%). Over the past eight quarters, FREQUENCY ELECTRONICS INC's revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs -23.1%).
Boxlight Corp is a global provider of interactive technology solutions, including interactive flat panel displays, projectors, collaborative software, and classroom technology accessories. It primarily serves K-12 and higher education institutions, as well as corporate and government customers across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific, focusing on enhancing learning and work collaboration efficiency.
Ultra Electronics Holdings is a British defence and security company. It was listed on the London Stock Exchange and was a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index until it was acquired by Cobham, which is itself owned by Advent International.
BOXL vs FEIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $29.3M | $17.1M |
| Net Profit | $-6.2M | $1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 29.1% | 38.2% |
| Operating Margin | -13.4% | 10.0% |
| Net Margin | -21.1% | 10.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -19.2% | 8.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -102.0% | -32.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.88 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.3M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.9M | $20.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.0M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.3M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.5M | $15.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.1M | $13.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.2M | $634.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.7M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.7M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.1M | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.5M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.1M | $130.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.1% | 36.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.0% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.6% | 48.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.8% | 44.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.7% | 40.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 34.5% | 22.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.7% | 16.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -67.6% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.4% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.7% | -3.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.1% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.3% | 16.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 81.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -69.6% | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.4% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.8% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.1% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.88 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.53 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-87.29 | $0.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.72 | $0.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.92 | $0.28 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.76 | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.8M | $3.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $36.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-19.5M | $58.5M |
| Total Assets | $99.6M | $92.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.8M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0M | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | $18.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.8M | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $58.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.5M | $56.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.6M | $55.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $51.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-12.9M | $36.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | $39.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.1M | $36.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $92.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.6M | $93.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.2M | $93.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $86.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $115.3M | $77.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.9M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.3M | $83.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $142.4M | $77.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.93× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.38× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.23× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.3M | $-523.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -6.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-5.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-523.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-155.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6M | $3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $7.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.9M | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $385.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-786.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 42.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 32.36× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BOXL
| Products | $27.4M | 93% |
| Services | $2.0M | 7% |
FEIM
| POC Revenue | $14.8M | 86% |
| POT Revenue | $2.3M | 13% |
