vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BRADY CORP (BRC) and Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BRADY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($405.3M vs $270.2M, roughly 1.5× Fossil Group, Inc.). BRADY CORP runs the higher net margin — 13.3% vs -14.8%, a 28.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BRADY CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.5% vs -21.1%). BRADY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($22.4M vs $-22.5M). Over the past eight quarters, BRADY CORP's revenue compounded faster (12.1% CAGR vs -11.4%).
Brady Corporation is an American developer and manufacturer of specialty products, technical equipment, and services for identifying components used in workplaces. Headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Brady employs 6,600 people in North and South America, Europe, Asia, and Australia and serves customers and markets globally. Brady Corporation was founded as W.H. Brady Co. in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, in 1914, by William Henry Brady (1879–1953). In 1984, the company went public and began tradi...
Fossil Group, Inc., is an American fashion design and manufacturer founded in 1984 by Tom Kartsotis and based in Richardson, Texas. Their brands include Fossil, Relic, Michele Watch, Skagen Denmark, WSI, and Zodiac Watches. Fossil also makes licensed accessories for brands such as BMW, Puma, Emporio Armani, Michael Kors, DKNY, Diesel, Kate Spade New York, Tory Burch, Chaps, and Armani Exchange.
BRC vs FOSL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $405.3M | $270.2M |
| Net Profit | $53.9M | $-40.0M |
| Gross Margin | 51.5% | 49.0% |
| Operating Margin | 16.8% | -8.0% |
| Net Margin | 13.3% | -14.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.5% | -21.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.3% | -257.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $405.3M | $270.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $397.3M | $220.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $382.6M | $233.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $356.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $377.1M | $342.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $343.4M | $287.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $343.4M | $260.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $322.6M | $254.9M |
| Q4 25 | $53.9M | $-40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.9M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.3M | $-17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.8M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.5M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.9M | $-38.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.6M | $-24.3M |
| Q4 25 | 51.5% | 49.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.4% | 57.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.0% | 61.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.3% | 53.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 51.6% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.6% | 52.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.2% | 52.4% |
| Q4 25 | 16.8% | -8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | -2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.6% | -4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.3% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.5% | -13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.7% | -11.5% |
| Q4 25 | 13.3% | -14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.6% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.7% | -7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | -11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.8% | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.5% | -9.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.73 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $182.7M | $79.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $115.9M | $169.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $112.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $701.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.09× | 1.50× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $182.7M | $79.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $174.3M | $109.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.2M | $78.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $145.7M | $123.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $250.1M | $106.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.5M | $104.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $143.9M | $112.9M |
| Q4 25 | $115.9M | $169.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.8M | $165.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $167.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $162.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $90.9M | $173.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $156.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $202.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $112.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $150.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $140.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $148.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $189.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $229.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $701.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $704.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $686.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $763.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $812.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $785.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $891.0M |
| Q4 25 | 0.09× | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.08× | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.09× | 1.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.89× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $33.4M | $-22.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $22.4M | $-22.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.5% | -8.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.62× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $159.9M | $-46.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $33.4M | $-22.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $58.3M | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.9M | $-60.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.4M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.0M | $-22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.7M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.1M | $622.0K |
| Q4 25 | $22.4M | $-22.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.4M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.6M | $-60.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.1M | $28.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.2M | $-24.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.4M | $36.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-13.5M | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.4% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.5% | -26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.3% | -8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.8% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -4.2% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.4% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.15× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.83× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BRC
| Americas Asia | $215.1M | 53% |
| Europe Australia | $119.9M | 30% |
| Other | $70.2M | 17% |
FOSL
| Transferred At Point In Time | $109.7M | 41% |
| Traditional Watches | $91.3M | 34% |
| Other | $50.8M | 19% |
| Leathers | $9.5M | 4% |
| Jewelry | $4.0M | 1% |
| Smartwatches | $3.3M | 1% |
| Products Other | $1.6M | 1% |
