vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BRUKER CORP (BRKR) and Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BRUKER CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($977.2M vs $828.2M, roughly 1.2× Rithm Capital Corp.). Rithm Capital Corp. runs the higher net margin — 13.2% vs 2.7%, a 10.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Rithm Capital Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (508.5% vs -0.2%). Over the past eight quarters, BRUKER CORP's revenue compounded faster (16.4% CAGR vs -17.9%).
Bruker Corporation is an American manufacturer of scientific instruments for molecular and materials research, as well as for industrial and applied analysis. It is headquartered in Billerica, Massachusetts, and is the publicly traded parent company of Bruker Scientific Instruments and Bruker Energy & Supercon Technologies (BEST) divisions.
Rithm Capital Corp. (Rithm) is an American investment management company headquartered in New York that focuses on real estate and alternative investments.
BRKR vs RITM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $977.2M | $828.2M |
| Net Profit | $26.0M | $109.5M |
| Gross Margin | 46.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.8% | 29.9% |
| Net Margin | 2.7% | 13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.2% | 508.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 89.8% | 27.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | $0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $828.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $977.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $860.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $797.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $801.4M | $768.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $979.6M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $864.4M | $619.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $800.7M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $109.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.0M | $85.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-59.6M | $221.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.6M | $311.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4M | $78.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.7M | $290.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.9M | $121.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $235.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 46.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 48.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 48.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.8% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.0% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 25.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | 23.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.0% | 23.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.9% | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 25.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 19.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.41 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.11 | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.27 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $0.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $298.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.5B | $9.1B |
| Total Assets | $6.2B | $53.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.76× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $298.8M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $293.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $184.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $183.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $148.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $169.7M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $35.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $32.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $31.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $32.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $32.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $29.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $30.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $7.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $7.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $7.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $7.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $53.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.2B | $53.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $47.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3B | $44.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $45.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.8B | $46.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1B | $42.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.9B | $42.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.76× | 4.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.83× | 3.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.34× | 3.92× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.15× | 4.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.18× | 4.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.27× | 3.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.21× | 4.10× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $229.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $207.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 21.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 8.84× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $43.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $229.8M | $-114.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-33.2M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-127.5M | $-557.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.0M | $-1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.4M | $768.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | $-55.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $207.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-54.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-148.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $153.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-23.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.84× | -1.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -9.22× | ||
| Q2 25 | -16.78× | -1.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.74× | 18.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.87× | -6.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.94× | 6.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | -0.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BRKR
| Bsi Nano | $309.1M | 32% |
| Bsi Biospin | $267.0M | 27% |
| Other | $179.9M | 18% |
| Transferred Over Time | $142.5M | 15% |
| Energy And Supercon Technologies | $69.5M | 7% |
RITM
| Servicing revenue, net | $375.1M | 45% |
| Other | $234.9M | 28% |
| Gain on originated residential mortgage loans, held-for-sale, net | $195.0M | 24% |
| Other revenue | $23.3M | 3% |
