vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS) and FORMFACTOR INC (FORM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Dutch Bros Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($443.6M vs $226.1M, roughly 2.0× FORMFACTOR INC). FORMFACTOR INC runs the higher net margin — 9.0% vs 4.8%, a 4.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FORMFACTOR INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.0% vs 29.4%). FORMFACTOR INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($30.7M vs $8.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Dutch Bros Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.0% CAGR vs 7.0%).

Dutch Bros Inc., originally written Dutch Bros., is a publicly held drive-through coffee chain in the United States. Founded in 1992 by Dane and Travis Boersma, it is headquartered in Tempe, Arizona, after having been based in Grants Pass, Oregon, for many years prior to 2025. It has company-owned and franchise locations primarily located in the Western United States, although the company has expanded as far east as Orlando, Florida.

Formfactor, Inc. is a provider of test and measurement technologies for integrated circuits, with its headquarters in Livermore, California. It provides semiconductor companies with products to improve device performance and provide test and measurement technologies for integrated circuits.

BROS vs FORM — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
BROS
BROS
2.0× larger
BROS
$443.6M
$226.1M
FORM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
FORM
FORM
+2.6% gap
FORM
32.0%
29.4%
BROS
Higher net margin
FORM
FORM
4.2% more per $
FORM
9.0%
4.8%
BROS
More free cash flow
FORM
FORM
$22.3M more FCF
FORM
$30.7M
$8.5M
BROS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
BROS
BROS
Annualised
BROS
27.0%
7.0%
FORM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
BROS
BROS
FORM
FORM
Revenue
$443.6M
$226.1M
Net Profit
$21.4M
$20.4M
Gross Margin
24.1%
38.4%
Operating Margin
7.7%
7.4%
Net Margin
4.8%
9.0%
Revenue YoY
29.4%
32.0%
Net Profit YoY
491.6%
218.5%
EPS (diluted)
$0.17
$0.26

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BROS
BROS
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
$226.1M
Q4 25
$443.6M
$215.2M
Q3 25
$423.6M
$202.7M
Q2 25
$415.8M
$195.8M
Q1 25
$355.2M
$171.4M
Q4 24
$342.8M
$189.5M
Q3 24
$338.2M
$207.9M
Q2 24
$324.9M
$197.5M
Net Profit
BROS
BROS
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
$20.4M
Q4 25
$21.4M
$23.2M
Q3 25
$17.5M
$15.7M
Q2 25
$25.6M
$9.1M
Q1 25
$15.4M
$6.4M
Q4 24
$3.6M
$9.7M
Q3 24
$12.6M
$18.7M
Q2 24
$11.9M
$19.4M
Gross Margin
BROS
BROS
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
38.4%
Q4 25
24.1%
42.2%
Q3 25
25.2%
39.8%
Q2 25
28.9%
37.3%
Q1 25
25.3%
37.7%
Q4 24
25.7%
38.8%
Q3 24
26.6%
40.7%
Q2 24
27.8%
44.0%
Operating Margin
BROS
BROS
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
7.4%
Q4 25
7.7%
10.9%
Q3 25
9.8%
8.9%
Q2 25
13.1%
6.3%
Q1 25
8.7%
1.9%
Q4 24
4.6%
4.1%
Q3 24
9.6%
8.6%
Q2 24
9.9%
9.0%
Net Margin
BROS
BROS
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
9.0%
Q4 25
4.8%
10.8%
Q3 25
4.1%
7.7%
Q2 25
6.2%
4.6%
Q1 25
4.3%
3.7%
Q4 24
1.1%
5.1%
Q3 24
3.7%
9.0%
Q2 24
3.7%
9.8%
EPS (diluted)
BROS
BROS
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
$0.26
Q4 25
$0.17
$0.29
Q3 25
$0.14
$0.20
Q2 25
$0.20
$0.12
Q1 25
$0.13
$0.08
Q4 24
$0.03
$0.12
Q3 24
$0.11
$0.24
Q2 24
$0.12
$0.25

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BROS
BROS
FORM
FORM
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$269.4M
$123.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$202.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$680.8M
$1.1B
Total Assets
$3.0B
$1.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.30×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BROS
BROS
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
$123.5M
Q4 25
$269.4M
$103.3M
Q3 25
$267.2M
$266.0M
Q2 25
$254.4M
$249.3M
Q1 25
$316.4M
$299.0M
Q4 24
$293.4M
$360.0M
Q3 24
$281.1M
$354.5M
Q2 24
$260.9M
$357.6M
Total Debt
BROS
BROS
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
Q4 25
$202.5M
$12.2M
Q3 25
$202.3M
Q2 25
$203.3M
Q1 25
$284.2M
Q4 24
$238.0M
$13.3M
Q3 24
$241.2M
Q2 24
$244.3M
Stockholders' Equity
BROS
BROS
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
$1.1B
Q4 25
$680.8M
$1.0B
Q3 25
$656.6M
$1.0B
Q2 25
$636.2M
$990.0M
Q1 25
$599.1M
$965.9M
Q4 24
$537.4M
$947.8M
Q3 24
$523.1M
$955.0M
Q2 24
$509.1M
$947.9M
Total Assets
BROS
BROS
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
$1.3B
Q4 25
$3.0B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$2.9B
$1.2B
Q2 25
$2.8B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$2.8B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$2.5B
$1.1B
Q3 24
$2.4B
$1.2B
Q2 24
$2.4B
$1.2B
Debt / Equity
BROS
BROS
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.30×
0.01×
Q3 25
0.31×
Q2 25
0.32×
Q1 25
0.47×
Q4 24
0.44×
0.01×
Q3 24
0.46×
Q2 24
0.48×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BROS
BROS
FORM
FORM
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$79.6M
$45.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$8.5M
$30.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
1.9%
13.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
16.0%
6.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.73×
2.21×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$54.4M
$37.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BROS
BROS
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
$45.0M
Q4 25
$79.6M
$46.0M
Q3 25
$89.1M
$27.0M
Q2 25
$89.9M
$18.9M
Q1 25
$36.9M
$23.5M
Q4 24
$62.2M
$35.9M
Q3 24
$83.5M
$26.7M
Q2 24
$59.5M
$21.9M
Free Cash Flow
BROS
BROS
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
$30.7M
Q4 25
$8.5M
$34.7M
Q3 25
$18.9M
$19.5M
Q2 25
$35.7M
$-47.4M
Q1 25
$-8.7M
$5.0M
Q4 24
$19.5M
$28.3M
Q3 24
$26.4M
$17.8M
Q2 24
$-4.9M
$13.5M
FCF Margin
BROS
BROS
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
13.6%
Q4 25
1.9%
16.1%
Q3 25
4.5%
9.6%
Q2 25
8.6%
-24.2%
Q1 25
-2.4%
2.9%
Q4 24
5.7%
14.9%
Q3 24
7.8%
8.6%
Q2 24
-1.5%
6.8%
Capex Intensity
BROS
BROS
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
6.7%
Q4 25
16.0%
5.3%
Q3 25
16.6%
3.7%
Q2 25
13.0%
33.8%
Q1 25
12.8%
10.8%
Q4 24
12.5%
4.0%
Q3 24
16.9%
4.3%
Q2 24
19.8%
4.3%
Cash Conversion
BROS
BROS
FORM
FORM
Q1 26
2.21×
Q4 25
3.73×
1.98×
Q3 25
5.09×
1.72×
Q2 25
3.51×
2.08×
Q1 25
2.40×
3.68×
Q4 24
17.23×
3.70×
Q3 24
6.60×
1.43×
Q2 24
4.99×
1.13×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BROS
BROS

Company Operated Shops$409.6M92%
Franchise Fees$32.3M7%
Other$1.8M0%

FORM
FORM

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons