vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brixmor Property Group Inc. (BRX) and CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. (CSW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brixmor Property Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($354.8M vs $233.0M, roughly 1.5× CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC.). Brixmor Property Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 36.0% vs 4.4%, a 31.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CSW INDUSTRIALS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.3% vs 5.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Brixmor Property Group Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.0% CAGR vs 5.1%).
Brixmor Property Group is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
BRX vs CSW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $354.8M | $233.0M |
| Net Profit | $127.8M | $10.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.7% |
| Operating Margin | 37.8% | 7.4% |
| Net Margin | 36.0% | 4.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.1% | 20.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 83.2% | -61.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.41 | $0.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $354.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $353.8M | $233.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $340.8M | $277.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $339.5M | $263.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $337.5M | $230.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $328.4M | $193.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $320.7M | $227.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $315.7M | $226.2M |
| Q1 26 | $127.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $137.1M | $10.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.2M | $40.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.1M | $40.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | $35.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $83.4M | $26.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.8M | $36.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.1M | $38.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 39.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 47.5% |
| Q1 26 | 37.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.3% |
| Q1 26 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.6% | 14.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.2% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | 17.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.41 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.43 | $0.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $2.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $2.43 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.23 | $2.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.27 | $1.60 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | $2.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.23 | $2.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $323.9M | $40.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.0B | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $9.1B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $323.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $334.4M | $40.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.5M | $31.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.0M | $38.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $106.5M | $225.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $377.6M | $213.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $451.3M | $273.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $473.6M | $18.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1B | $800.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $650.2M |
| Q1 26 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.7B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.73× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.79× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $28.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $22.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 9.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 2.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $162.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $652.0M | $28.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.3M | $61.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $181.5M | $60.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.1M | $27.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $624.7M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.5M | $66.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $183.5M | $62.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $22.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $58.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $57.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $59.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 26.3% |
| Q1 26 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.75× | 2.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.79× | 1.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.13× | 1.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.87× | 0.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.49× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.63× | 1.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.62× | 1.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BRX
| Rental income | $354.3M | 100% |
| Other revenues | $482.0K | 0% |
CSW
| Contractor Solutions Segment | $166.3M | 71% |
| Specialized Reliability Solutions Segment | $38.2M | 16% |
| Engineered Building Solutions Segment | $28.5M | 12% |
