vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brixmor Property Group Inc. (BRX) and Vroom, Inc. (VRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brixmor Property Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($354.8M vs $235.9M, roughly 1.5× Vroom, Inc.). Brixmor Property Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 36.0% vs -59.8%, a 95.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vroom, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs 5.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Brixmor Property Group Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.0% CAGR vs -49.5%).
Brixmor Property Group is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
Vroom, Inc. is a parent company of United Auto Credit Corporation (UACC) and CarStory. Previously, Vroom was a used car retailer and e-commerce company that let consumers buy, sell, and finance cars online. Vroom ceased e-commerce automotive sales operations on January 22, 2024.
BRX vs VRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $354.8M | $235.9M |
| Net Profit | $127.8M | $-141.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.3% |
| Operating Margin | 37.8% | -11.5% |
| Net Margin | 36.0% | -59.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.1% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 83.2% | -669.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.41 | $-80.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $354.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $353.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $340.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $339.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $337.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $328.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $320.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $315.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | $127.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $137.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $83.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | 37.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.41 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.43 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.23 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.27 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.23 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $323.9M | $135.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $454.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.0B | $127.7M |
| Total Assets | $9.1B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.56× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $323.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $334.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $106.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $377.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $451.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $473.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | — |
| Q1 26 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.83× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.79× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-108.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-108.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -46.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-536.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $652.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $181.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $624.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $183.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.75× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.79× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.13× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.49× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.62× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BRX
| Rental income | $354.3M | 100% |
| Other revenues | $482.0K | 0% |
VRM
Segment breakdown not available.
