vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brixmor Property Group Inc. (BRX) and WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. (WH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brixmor Property Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($354.8M vs $334.0M, roughly 1.1× WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.). Brixmor Property Group Inc. runs the higher net margin — 36.0% vs -18.0%, a 54.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Brixmor Property Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.1% vs -76.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Brixmor Property Group Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.0% CAGR vs -4.6%).
Brixmor Property Group is a publicly traded real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc., is an American hospitality company based in Parsippany, New Jersey, United States. It describes itself as the largest hotel franchisor in the world, with 9,100 locations.
BRX vs WH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $354.8M | $334.0M |
| Net Profit | $127.8M | $-60.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 37.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 36.0% | -18.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.1% | -76.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 83.2% | -170.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.41 | $-0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $354.8M | $334.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $353.8M | $334.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $340.8M | $382.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $339.5M | $397.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $337.5M | $316.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $328.4M | $336.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $320.7M | $396.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $315.7M | $367.0M |
| Q1 26 | $127.8M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $137.1M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.2M | $105.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.1M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | $61.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $83.4M | $85.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.8M | $102.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.1M | $86.0M |
| Q1 26 | 37.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 46.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.5% |
| Q1 26 | 36.0% | -18.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.8% | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.6% | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.7% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.4% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.2% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.2% | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.41 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.43 | $-0.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.31 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $1.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.23 | $0.78 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.27 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | $1.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.23 | $1.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $323.9M | $64.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.0B | $468.0M |
| Total Assets | $9.1B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $323.9M | $64.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $334.4M | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.5M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $105.0M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $106.5M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $377.6M | $103.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $451.3M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $473.6M | $70.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | $468.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $468.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $570.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $579.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $650.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $623.0M |
| Q1 26 | $9.1B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.6B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.6B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.7B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.83× | 5.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.85× | 4.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.73× | 4.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.73× | 4.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.79× | 3.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.83× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $367.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $168.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $437.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $367.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $652.0M | $152.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.3M | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $181.5M | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.1M | $59.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $624.7M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.5M | $79.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $183.5M | $1.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $52.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.6% |
| Q1 26 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.75× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.79× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.13× | 0.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.87× | 0.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.49× | 1.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.63× | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.62× | 0.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BRX
| Rental income | $354.3M | 100% |
| Other revenues | $482.0K | 0% |
WH
| Fee-related and other revenues | $334.0M | 100% |
| Management and other fees | $2.0M | 1% |
