vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) and California Resources Corp (CRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
California Resources Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($119.0M vs $95.2M, roughly 1.3× Black Stone Minerals, L.P.). Over the past eight quarters, Black Stone Minerals, L.P.'s revenue compounded faster (-9.7% CAGR vs -46.3%).
Black Stone Minerals, L.P., or Black Stone Minerals, is a Houston, Texas-based oil and natural gas corporation.
California Resources CorpCRCEarnings & Financial Report
California Resources Corporation is an American energy corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in California. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Long Beach, California. Its mineral acreage holdings in California constitute the largest privately held position in the state.
BSM vs CRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $95.2M | $119.0M |
| Net Profit | $72.2M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 78.6% | -597.5% |
| Net Margin | 75.9% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -8.7% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 55.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-8.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $119.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $95.2M | $679.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.2M | $715.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $702.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.3M | $814.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.3M | $826.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $103.2M | $870.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.2M | $412.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $72.2M | $12.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.7M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.0M | $172.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $115.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.3M | $33.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.7M | $345.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $68.3M | $8.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | -597.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 78.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 89.5% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 38.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.9% | 22.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.6% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.2% | 59.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.5% | 9.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 75.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.2% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 112.5% | 24.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 89.9% | 39.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.3% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-8.02 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.76 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.92 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.87 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.78 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5M | $132.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9M | $196.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $72.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $214.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $372.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.0M | $241.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $4.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $65.1M | $99.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-32.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -26.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.90× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $380.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $99.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $65.1M | $235.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.8M | $279.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.5M | $165.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.8M | $186.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $91.0M | $206.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.2M | $220.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.4M | $97.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-32.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $115.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $188.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $109.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $131.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $118.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $141.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $63.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | -26.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.90× | 19.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | 4.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 0.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.07× | 1.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.96× | 6.24× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.01× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.47× | 12.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BSM
| Oil Reserves | $46.4M | 49% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $44.1M | 46% |
| Real Estate | $4.7M | 5% |
CRC
Segment breakdown not available.
