vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) and PETROBRAS - PETROLEO BRASILEIRO SA (PBR), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PETROBRAS - PETROLEO BRASILEIRO SA is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.0B vs $95.2M, roughly 221.0× Black Stone Minerals, L.P.). Black Stone Minerals, L.P. runs the higher net margin — 75.9% vs 22.6%, a 53.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Black Stone Minerals, L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-8.7% vs -10.4%).
Black Stone Minerals, L.P., or Black Stone Minerals, is a Houston, Texas-based oil and natural gas corporation.
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A., better known by and trading as the portmanteau Petrobras, is a Brazilian majority state-owned multinational corporation in the petroleum industry, which is headquartered in Rio de Janeiro. The company's name translates to Brazilian Petroleum Corporation.
BSM vs PBR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $95.2M | $21.0B |
| Net Profit | $72.2M | $4.8B |
| Gross Margin | — | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | 78.6% | 25.4% |
| Net Margin | 75.9% | 22.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.7% | -10.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 55.8% | 1563.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $95.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $21.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $103.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.2M | $23.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $72.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.0M | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $68.3M | $-325.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 78.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 89.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.5% | 28.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 75.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 112.5% | 22.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 89.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.3% | -1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5M | $7.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $73.6B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $215.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $7.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $40.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $67.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $215.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $190.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $65.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 0.90× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $65.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $91.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.07× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.47× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.63× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BSM
| Oil Reserves | $46.4M | 49% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $44.1M | 46% |
| Real Estate | $4.7M | 5% |
PBR
Segment breakdown not available.
