vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) and P10, Inc. (PX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Black Stone Minerals, L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($95.2M vs $81.0M, roughly 1.2× P10, Inc.). Black Stone Minerals, L.P. runs the higher net margin — 75.9% vs 11.7%, a 64.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, P10, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.7% vs -8.7%). Over the past eight quarters, P10, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.7% CAGR vs -9.7%).
Black Stone Minerals, L.P., or Black Stone Minerals, is a Houston, Texas-based oil and natural gas corporation.
P10, Inc. is a global alternative investment management firm that offers a diversified portfolio of investment solutions spanning private equity, private credit, real assets and venture capital. It primarily caters to institutional clients including pension funds, endowments, foundations, and high-net-worth individuals across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.
BSM vs PX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $95.2M | $81.0M |
| Net Profit | $72.2M | $9.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 78.6% | 31.9% |
| Net Margin | 75.9% | 11.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.7% | -4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 55.8% | 79.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $95.2M | $81.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.2M | $75.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $72.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.3M | $67.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.3M | $85.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $103.2M | $74.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.2M | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.8M | $66.1M |
| Q4 25 | $72.2M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.7M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.0M | $3.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.7M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $68.3M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.9M | $5.0M |
| Q4 25 | 78.6% | 31.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 89.5% | 14.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.9% | 16.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.6% | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.2% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.5% | 23.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.8% | 18.3% |
| Q4 25 | 75.9% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.2% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 112.5% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.4% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 89.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.7% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.04 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5M | $28.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $373.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $403.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $928.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.93× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.5M | $28.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $74.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.0M | $61.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $31.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $40.5M | $29.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $373.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $393.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $373.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $357.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $319.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $319.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $300.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $314.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $403.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $396.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $388.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $374.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $394.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $396.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $400.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $928.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $936.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $932.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $877.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $869.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $857.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $823.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $832.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.78× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $65.1M | $23.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $18.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 22.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 6.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.90× | 2.43× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $14.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $65.1M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.8M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.5M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.8M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $91.0M | $101.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.2M | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.4M | $34.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.5M | $11.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $96.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $33.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 113.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 47.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.90× | 2.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | -4.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 3.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.07× | -1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.96× | 19.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.01× | 19.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.47× | 4.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.63× | 2.18× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BSM
| Oil Reserves | $46.4M | 49% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $44.1M | 46% |
| Real Estate | $4.7M | 5% |
PX
| Management Fees | $78.1M | 96% |
| Advisory Fees | $1.8M | 2% |
