vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) and Sila Realty Trust, Inc. (SILA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Black Stone Minerals, L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($95.2M vs $50.1M, roughly 1.9× Sila Realty Trust, Inc.). Black Stone Minerals, L.P. runs the higher net margin — 75.9% vs 10.0%, a 65.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Sila Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs -8.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Sila Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.6% CAGR vs -9.7%).
Black Stone Minerals, L.P., or Black Stone Minerals, is a Houston, Texas-based oil and natural gas corporation.
Sila Realty Trust, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that owns, operates, and acquires high-quality income-generating commercial properties. Its core portfolio covers industrial logistics facilities, office assets and mixed-use properties, serving tenants across logistics, corporate and retail segments to deliver stable long-term returns.
BSM vs SILA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $95.2M | $50.1M |
| Net Profit | $72.2M | $5.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 88.9% |
| Operating Margin | 78.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 75.9% | 10.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.7% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 55.8% | -54.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $95.2M | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $105.2M | $49.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.7M | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.3M | $48.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.3M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $103.2M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.2M | $43.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.8M | $50.6M |
| Q4 25 | $72.2M | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.7M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.0M | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.3M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.7M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $68.3M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.9M | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 88.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 86.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 87.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 86.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 89.0% |
| Q4 25 | 78.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 89.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 45.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 75.9% | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.2% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 112.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.8% | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.4% | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 89.9% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.3% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 54.7% | 29.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.5M | $32.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.5M | $32.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9M | $27.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4M | $30.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5M | $39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.0M | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $40.5M | $90.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $2.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $65.1M | $119.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.90× | 23.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $65.1M | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.8M | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.5M | $31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.8M | $24.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $91.0M | $132.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.2M | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.4M | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $104.5M | $36.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.90× | 23.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.09× | 2.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 3.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.07× | 3.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.96× | 11.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.01× | 2.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.47× | 6.84× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.63× | 2.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BSM
| Oil Reserves | $46.4M | 49% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $44.1M | 46% |
| Real Estate | $4.7M | 5% |
SILA
Segment breakdown not available.
