vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BT Brands, Inc. (BTBD) and Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BT Brands, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.9M vs $3.6M, roughly 1.1× Solid Power, Inc.). On growth, BT Brands, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-11.4% vs -18.6%). BT Brands, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($261.8K vs $-23.0M). Over the past eight quarters, BT Brands, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.8% CAGR vs -21.9%).
BT Brands, Inc.BTBDEarnings & Financial Report
BT Group plc is a British multinational telecommunications holding company headquartered in London, England. It has operations in around 180 countries and is the largest provider of fixed-line, broadband and mobile services in the UK, and also provides subscription television and IT services.
Solid Energy was the largest coal mining company in New Zealand and is a state owned enterprise of the New Zealand Government.
BTBD vs SLDP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.9M | $3.6M |
| Net Profit | $915.0K | — |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.1% | -730.1% |
| Net Margin | 23.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -11.4% | -18.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 516.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.15 | $-0.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8M | $6.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.3M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.2M | $6.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $915.0K | $-25.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.0K | $-25.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-329.8K | $-15.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-219.5K | $-22.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-70.0K | $-22.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-445.7K | $-21.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -730.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.1% | -654.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.0% | -398.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.0% | -399.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -561.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.7% | -593.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.6% | -530.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -19.8% | -433.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.7% | -693.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | -390.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.2% | -251.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.0% | -482.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.7% | -438.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -14.0% | -356.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.5M | $250.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.7M | $415.7M |
| Total Assets | $11.9M | $455.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $250.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5M | $251.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0M | $230.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7M | $240.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $118.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $140.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5M | $146.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $415.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7M | $381.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8M | $370.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.7M | $397.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $410.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.5M | $439.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.7M | $456.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.8M | $479.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $455.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.9M | $416.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.2M | $398.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0M | $419.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $448.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.7M | $470.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.0M | $492.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.0M | $516.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $325.2K | $-18.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $261.8K | $-23.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.8% | -633.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 126.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.36× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-83.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $325.2K | $-14.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $384.4K | $-14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-306.7K | $-26.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-13.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $129.3K | $-9.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.5K | $-11.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-408.9K | $-29.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-23.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.8K | $-14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-431.1K | $-28.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-18.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.4K | $-12.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.7K | $-15.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-521.3K | $-33.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | -633.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | -397.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -264.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.3% | -476.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -416.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.2% | -271.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.3% | -305.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.3% | -556.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 126.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 41.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 39.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 105.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 59.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 86.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 68.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
