vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bitcoin Depot Inc. (BTM) and DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. (DDI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bitcoin Depot Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($162.5M vs $83.0M, roughly 2.0× DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd.). DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 30.2% vs 3.4%, a 26.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bitcoin Depot Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.1% vs 13.7%). DoubleDown Interactive Co., Ltd. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($31.6M vs $2.5M).
Bitcoin Depot Inc. is one of the largest cryptocurrency ATM operators across North America. It provides retail consumers with accessible in-person kiosks to buy and sell Bitcoin and other leading digital assets, alongside online crypto purchase services via bank transfer. Its self-service kiosks are located in high-traffic retail spaces including grocery stores, gas stations and convenience stores.
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. is an American video game holding company based in New York City founded by Ryan Brant in September 1993.
BTM vs DDI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $162.5M | $83.0M |
| Net Profit | $5.5M | $25.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 70.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | 42.5% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 30.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 20.1% | 13.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 690.4% | -7.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.08 | $10.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $162.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $172.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $164.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.3M | $83.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.1M | $88.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.5M | $88.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | $148.4M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $179.5M | $73.0M |
| Q3 25 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-939.0K | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.6M | $33.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5M | $30.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-8.3M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-7.1M | $26.9M |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 70.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 69.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 68.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 42.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 41.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 35.2% | ||
| Q4 23 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 4.1% | 40.7% |
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.7% | 30.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.6% | 37.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.1% | 34.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | -5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -4.0% | 36.9% |
| Q3 25 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.20 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $10.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | $13.39 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.25 | $12.23 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-0.43 | $10.87 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $59.3M | $372.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $67.5M | $37.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $21.0M | $815.5M |
| Total Assets | $125.3M | $879.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.21× | 0.05× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $59.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.2M | $372.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.9M | $339.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.2M | $309.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | $29.8M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $29.7M | $271.2M |
| Q3 25 | $67.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $66.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.5M | $37.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.2M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.6M | $37.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | $22.5M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $20.8M | $37.2M |
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.9M | $815.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.4M | $786.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | $755.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $6.6M | $697.9M |
| Q3 25 | $125.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $89.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.4M | $879.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $97.5M | $852.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $90.1M | $831.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | $74.3M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $78.5M | $760.6M |
| Q3 25 | 3.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.18× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.27× | 0.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.54× | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 3.15× | 0.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.6M | $31.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.5M | $31.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.6% | 38.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.20× | 1.27× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $27.1M | $129.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $6.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8M | $31.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1M | $34.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3M | $34.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $7.0M | $28.7M |
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.0M | $31.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $34.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $789.0K | $34.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $7.0M | $28.7M |
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.8% | 38.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 39.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 39.6% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 3.9% | 39.3% |
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.0% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Q3 25 | 1.20× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.88× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 1.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
