vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of biote Corp. (BTMD) and HOOKER FURNISHINGS Corp (HOFT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HOOKER FURNISHINGS Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($70.7M vs $46.4M, roughly 1.5× biote Corp.). biote Corp. runs the higher net margin — 4.2% vs -29.9%, a 34.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, HOOKER FURNISHINGS Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.0% vs -6.9%). Over the past eight quarters, biote Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.4% CAGR vs -22.2%).
biote Corp is a healthcare company specializing in personalized bioidentical hormone replacement therapy solutions for adult men and women. It operates primarily in the U.S. market, offering training programs for licensed healthcare providers, along with complementary wellness supplements and diagnostic services to support patient care outcomes.
Hooker Furnishings Corp is a leading home furnishings manufacturer and marketer, offering residential seating, dining sets, bedroom furniture, home office pieces and custom upholstery. It serves retailers, designers and hospitality clients across North America, focusing on premium craftsmanship and diverse design styles.
BTMD vs HOFT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.4M | $70.7M |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | $-21.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 25.6% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | -23.1% |
| Net Margin | 4.2% | -29.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -6.9% | 0.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -47.2% | 0.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.05 | $-1.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $46.4M | $70.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.0M | $82.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.9M | $85.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.0M | $126.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.8M | $82.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.4M | $95.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.2M | $93.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $-21.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.2M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.7M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.7M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.1M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 25.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.7% | -23.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.2% | -5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.0% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.8% | -3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | -6.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.7% | -3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.7% | -5.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.2% | -29.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.1% | -4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | -3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.4% | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.4% | -4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.05 | $-1.99 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.22 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.10 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.37 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.09 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.33 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.21 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.12 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $24.1M | $1.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $103.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-58.5M | $169.8M |
| Total Assets | $107.6M | $240.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $24.1M | $1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $821.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.6M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.7M | $6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.3M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $38.2M | $42.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.4M | $40.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $103.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $104.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $107.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $109.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $110.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $114.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-58.5M | $169.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-72.8M | $193.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-85.1M | $199.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-90.0M | $204.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-105.9M | $208.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-130.3M | $215.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-143.2M | $219.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $107.6M | $240.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.3M | $278.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $104.8M | $299.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $123.4M | $313.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $122.4M | $326.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.3M | $332.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.9M | $335.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $160.1M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $7.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $6.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.87× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $30.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1M | $14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.5M | $-10.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.4M | $-17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.6M | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.0M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.4M | $634.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | 16.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.87× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.22× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.34× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.45× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BTMD
| Product Revenue | $45.3M | 98% |
| Disposable Trocars Product Revenue | $1.2M | 3% |
HOFT
| Upholstery | $36.7M | 52% |
| Domestic Upholstery | $30.2M | 43% |
| All Other | $4.0M | 6% |
