vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. (BTSG) and NetEase, Inc. (NTES). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

NetEase, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.0B vs $3.6B, roughly 1.1× BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.). NetEase, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 31.0% vs 2.2%, a 28.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. NetEase, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.8B vs $193.9M). Over the past eight quarters, BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (17.4% CAGR vs 9.7%).

Cardinal Health, Inc. is an American multinational health care services company, and the 15th highest revenue generating company in the United States. Headquartered in Dublin, Ohio, the company specializes in the distribution of pharmaceuticals and medical products, serving more than 100,000 locations. The company also manufactures medical and surgical product, including gloves, surgical apparel, and fluid management products. In addition, it operates one of the largest networks of radiopharm...

NetEase, Inc. is a Chinese developer and publisher of online PC and mobile games, advertising services, email services, and e-commerce platforms. It is one of the largest Internet and video game companies in the world and was founded by Ding Lei in June 1997.

BTSG vs NTES — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
NTES
NTES
1.1× larger
NTES
$4.0B
$3.6B
BTSG
Higher net margin
NTES
NTES
28.8% more per $
NTES
31.0%
2.2%
BTSG
More free cash flow
NTES
NTES
$1.6B more FCF
NTES
$1.8B
$193.9M
BTSG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
BTSG
BTSG
Annualised
BTSG
17.4%
9.7%
NTES

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
BTSG
BTSG
NTES
NTES
Revenue
$3.6B
$4.0B
Net Profit
$77.1M
$1.2B
Gross Margin
11.6%
64.1%
Operating Margin
3.0%
28.3%
Net Margin
2.2%
31.0%
Revenue YoY
16.3%
Net Profit YoY
381.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.34

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BTSG
BTSG
NTES
NTES
Q4 25
$3.6B
Q3 25
$3.3B
$4.0B
Q2 25
$3.1B
$3.9B
Q1 25
$2.9B
$4.0B
Q4 24
$3.1B
Q3 24
$2.9B
$3.7B
Q2 24
$2.7B
$3.5B
Q1 24
$2.6B
$3.7B
Net Profit
BTSG
BTSG
NTES
NTES
Q4 25
$77.1M
Q3 25
$55.8M
$1.2B
Q2 25
$28.2M
$1.3B
Q1 25
$29.5M
$1.5B
Q4 24
$16.0M
Q3 24
$-8.2M
$955.7M
Q2 24
$19.9M
$939.6M
Q1 24
$-45.8M
$1.1B
Gross Margin
BTSG
BTSG
NTES
NTES
Q4 25
11.6%
Q3 25
11.8%
64.1%
Q2 25
11.9%
64.7%
Q1 25
11.8%
64.1%
Q4 24
13.8%
Q3 24
14.0%
62.9%
Q2 24
14.2%
62.9%
Q1 24
14.3%
63.4%
Operating Margin
BTSG
BTSG
NTES
NTES
Q4 25
3.0%
Q3 25
2.6%
28.3%
Q2 25
1.5%
32.5%
Q1 25
1.8%
36.2%
Q4 24
2.6%
Q3 24
2.0%
27.3%
Q2 24
2.3%
27.4%
Q1 24
0.3%
28.4%
Net Margin
BTSG
BTSG
NTES
NTES
Q4 25
2.2%
Q3 25
1.7%
31.0%
Q2 25
0.9%
32.6%
Q1 25
1.0%
36.6%
Q4 24
0.5%
Q3 24
-0.3%
25.6%
Q2 24
0.7%
26.8%
Q1 24
-1.8%
29.1%
EPS (diluted)
BTSG
BTSG
NTES
NTES
Q4 25
$0.34
Q3 25
$0.26
Q2 25
$0.13
Q1 25
$0.14
Q4 24
$0.11
Q3 24
$-0.04
Q2 24
$0.10
Q1 24
$-0.26

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BTSG
BTSG
NTES
NTES
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$88.4M
$31.3B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.5B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.9B
$160.8B
Total Assets
$6.4B
$214.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.34×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BTSG
BTSG
NTES
NTES
Q4 25
$88.4M
Q3 25
$140.3M
$31.3B
Q2 25
$70.1M
$54.4B
Q1 25
$52.3M
$41.7B
Q4 24
$61.3M
Q3 24
$36.0M
$20.2B
Q2 24
$25.0M
$19.0B
Q1 24
$58.0M
$43.0B
Total Debt
BTSG
BTSG
NTES
NTES
Q4 25
$2.5B
Q3 25
$2.5B
Q2 25
$2.5B
Q1 25
$2.5B
Q4 24
$2.6B
Q3 24
$2.7B
Q2 24
$2.6B
Q1 24
$2.6B
Stockholders' Equity
BTSG
BTSG
NTES
NTES
Q4 25
$1.9B
Q3 25
$1.8B
$160.8B
Q2 25
$1.7B
$154.0B
Q1 25
$1.7B
$147.8B
Q4 24
$1.6B
Q3 24
$1.6B
$135.6B
Q2 24
$1.6B
$134.2B
Q1 24
$1.6B
$130.5B
Total Assets
BTSG
BTSG
NTES
NTES
Q4 25
$6.4B
Q3 25
$6.0B
$214.5B
Q2 25
$5.9B
$208.5B
Q1 25
$5.8B
$200.9B
Q4 24
$5.9B
Q3 24
$5.8B
$184.9B
Q2 24
$5.6B
$183.3B
Q1 24
$5.7B
$195.1B
Debt / Equity
BTSG
BTSG
NTES
NTES
Q4 25
1.34×
Q3 25
1.38×
Q2 25
1.45×
Q1 25
1.50×
Q4 24
1.58×
Q3 24
1.65×
Q2 24
1.63×
Q1 24
1.64×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BTSG
BTSG
NTES
NTES
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$231.6M
$1.8B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$193.9M
$1.8B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
5.5%
44.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.1%
1.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.00×
1.47×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$394.7M
$6.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BTSG
BTSG
NTES
NTES
Q4 25
$231.6M
Q3 25
$107.9M
$1.8B
Q2 25
$49.1M
$1.5B
Q1 25
$101.6M
$1.7B
Q4 24
$90.6M
Q3 24
$27.2M
$1.5B
Q2 24
$-15.2M
$898.8M
Q1 24
$-78.9M
$1.3B
Free Cash Flow
BTSG
BTSG
NTES
NTES
Q4 25
$193.9M
Q3 25
$92.2M
$1.8B
Q2 25
$24.7M
$1.5B
Q1 25
$84.0M
$1.6B
Q4 24
$75.3M
Q3 24
$7.2M
$1.5B
Q2 24
$-39.0M
$875.6M
Q1 24
$-100.7M
$1.3B
FCF Margin
BTSG
BTSG
NTES
NTES
Q4 25
5.5%
Q3 25
2.8%
44.7%
Q2 25
0.8%
38.3%
Q1 25
2.9%
40.4%
Q4 24
2.5%
Q3 24
0.2%
38.9%
Q2 24
-1.4%
25.0%
Q1 24
-3.9%
34.0%
Capex Intensity
BTSG
BTSG
NTES
NTES
Q4 25
1.1%
Q3 25
0.5%
1.0%
Q2 25
0.8%
0.7%
Q1 25
0.6%
1.6%
Q4 24
0.5%
Q3 24
0.7%
1.4%
Q2 24
0.9%
0.7%
Q1 24
0.8%
1.5%
Cash Conversion
BTSG
BTSG
NTES
NTES
Q4 25
3.00×
Q3 25
1.93×
1.47×
Q2 25
1.74×
1.20×
Q1 25
3.44×
1.15×
Q4 24
5.66×
Q3 24
1.58×
Q2 24
-0.76×
0.96×
Q1 24
1.22×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BTSG
BTSG

Medicare D$1.1B32%
Commercial Insurance$879.8M25%
Medicare C$641.2M18%
Provider Services$394.2M11%
Medicaid$301.4M8%
Medicare A$150.5M4%
Private And Other$44.0M1%
Medicare B$19.5M1%
Pharmacy Solutions And Provider Services Segments$19.0M1%

NTES
NTES

Games and related value-added services$3.3B82%
NetEase Cloud Music$275.9M7%
Youdao$228.8M6%
Innovative businesses and others$202.1M5%

Related Comparisons