vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of PEABODY ENERGY CORP (BTU) and CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. (CRUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

PEABODY ENERGY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $580.6M, roughly 1.8× CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.). CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. runs the higher net margin — 24.2% vs 1.2%, a 23.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.5% vs -9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (25.0% CAGR vs 1.9%).

Peabody Energy is an American coal mining company headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri. Its primary business consists of the mining, sale, and distribution of coal, which is purchased for use in electricity generation and steelmaking. Peabody also markets, brokers, and trades coal through offices in China, Australia, and the United States.

Cirrus Logic Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor supplier that specializes in analog, mixed-signal, and audio DSP integrated circuits (ICs). Since 1998, the company's headquarters have been in Austin, Texas.

BTU vs CRUS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
BTU
BTU
1.8× larger
BTU
$1.0B
$580.6M
CRUS
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
CRUS
CRUS
+13.5% gap
CRUS
4.5%
-9.0%
BTU
Higher net margin
CRUS
CRUS
23.0% more per $
CRUS
24.2%
1.2%
BTU
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
CRUS
CRUS
Annualised
CRUS
25.0%
1.9%
BTU

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
BTU
BTU
CRUS
CRUS
Revenue
$1.0B
$580.6M
Net Profit
$12.4M
$140.3M
Gross Margin
53.1%
Operating Margin
0.8%
26.3%
Net Margin
1.2%
24.2%
Revenue YoY
-9.0%
4.5%
Net Profit YoY
-67.2%
21.0%
EPS (diluted)
$0.11
$2.66

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BTU
BTU
CRUS
CRUS
Q4 25
$1.0B
$580.6M
Q3 25
$1.0B
$561.0M
Q2 25
$890.1M
$407.3M
Q1 25
$937.0M
$424.5M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$555.7M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$541.9M
Q2 24
$1.0B
$374.0M
Q1 24
$983.6M
$371.8M
Net Profit
BTU
BTU
CRUS
CRUS
Q4 25
$12.4M
$140.3M
Q3 25
$-70.1M
$131.6M
Q2 25
$-27.6M
$60.7M
Q1 25
$34.4M
$71.3M
Q4 24
$37.8M
$116.0M
Q3 24
$101.3M
$102.1M
Q2 24
$199.4M
$42.1M
Q1 24
$39.6M
$44.8M
Gross Margin
BTU
BTU
CRUS
CRUS
Q4 25
53.1%
Q3 25
52.5%
Q2 25
52.6%
Q1 25
53.4%
Q4 24
53.6%
Q3 24
52.2%
Q2 24
50.5%
Q1 24
51.8%
Operating Margin
BTU
BTU
CRUS
CRUS
Q4 25
0.8%
26.3%
Q3 25
-8.0%
25.8%
Q2 25
-4.3%
17.8%
Q1 25
3.4%
20.2%
Q4 24
3.6%
26.2%
Q3 24
11.0%
24.3%
Q2 24
22.4%
12.5%
Q1 24
5.2%
14.1%
Net Margin
BTU
BTU
CRUS
CRUS
Q4 25
1.2%
24.2%
Q3 25
-6.9%
23.5%
Q2 25
-3.1%
14.9%
Q1 25
3.7%
16.8%
Q4 24
3.4%
20.9%
Q3 24
9.3%
18.8%
Q2 24
19.1%
11.3%
Q1 24
4.0%
12.1%
EPS (diluted)
BTU
BTU
CRUS
CRUS
Q4 25
$0.11
$2.66
Q3 25
$-0.58
$2.48
Q2 25
$-0.23
$1.14
Q1 25
$0.27
$1.30
Q4 24
$0.25
$2.11
Q3 24
$0.74
$1.83
Q2 24
$1.42
$0.76
Q1 24
$0.29
$0.78

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BTU
BTU
CRUS
CRUS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$575.3M
$778.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$321.2M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.5B
$2.1B
Total Assets
$5.8B
$2.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.09×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BTU
BTU
CRUS
CRUS
Q4 25
$575.3M
$778.1M
Q3 25
$603.3M
$593.5M
Q2 25
$585.9M
$548.9M
Q1 25
$696.5M
$539.6M
Q4 24
$700.4M
$526.4M
Q3 24
$772.9M
$445.8M
Q2 24
$621.7M
$491.4M
Q1 24
$855.7M
$502.8M
Total Debt
BTU
BTU
CRUS
CRUS
Q4 25
$321.2M
Q3 25
$321.8M
Q2 25
$329.2M
Q1 25
$331.2M
Q4 24
$332.3M
Q3 24
$323.7M
Q2 24
$323.2M
Q1 24
$323.3M
Stockholders' Equity
BTU
BTU
CRUS
CRUS
Q4 25
$3.5B
$2.1B
Q3 25
$3.5B
$2.0B
Q2 25
$3.6B
$1.9B
Q1 25
$3.7B
$1.9B
Q4 24
$3.7B
$2.0B
Q3 24
$3.6B
$1.9B
Q2 24
$3.7B
$1.8B
Q1 24
$3.5B
$1.8B
Total Assets
BTU
BTU
CRUS
CRUS
Q4 25
$5.8B
$2.5B
Q3 25
$5.7B
$2.4B
Q2 25
$5.8B
$2.3B
Q1 25
$5.8B
$2.3B
Q4 24
$6.0B
$2.4B
Q3 24
$5.9B
$2.4B
Q2 24
$5.9B
$2.3B
Q1 24
$5.7B
$2.2B
Debt / Equity
BTU
BTU
CRUS
CRUS
Q4 25
0.09×
Q3 25
0.09×
Q2 25
0.09×
Q1 25
0.09×
Q4 24
0.09×
Q3 24
0.09×
Q2 24
0.09×
Q1 24
0.09×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BTU
BTU
CRUS
CRUS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$68.6M
$290.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$285.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
49.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
5.53×
2.07×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$614.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BTU
BTU
CRUS
CRUS
Q4 25
$68.6M
$290.8M
Q3 25
$122.0M
$92.2M
Q2 25
$23.2M
$116.1M
Q1 25
$119.9M
$130.4M
Q4 24
$119.8M
$218.6M
Q3 24
$359.9M
$8.2M
Q2 24
$7.8M
$87.2M
Q1 24
$119.0M
$170.5M
Free Cash Flow
BTU
BTU
CRUS
CRUS
Q4 25
$285.7M
Q3 25
$88.3M
Q2 25
$113.5M
Q1 25
$127.0M
Q4 24
$211.9M
Q3 24
$5.6M
Q2 24
$77.2M
Q1 24
$163.5M
FCF Margin
BTU
BTU
CRUS
CRUS
Q4 25
49.2%
Q3 25
15.7%
Q2 25
27.9%
Q1 25
29.9%
Q4 24
38.1%
Q3 24
1.0%
Q2 24
20.6%
Q1 24
44.0%
Capex Intensity
BTU
BTU
CRUS
CRUS
Q4 25
0.9%
Q3 25
0.7%
Q2 25
0.6%
Q1 25
0.8%
Q4 24
1.2%
Q3 24
0.5%
Q2 24
2.7%
Q1 24
1.9%
Cash Conversion
BTU
BTU
CRUS
CRUS
Q4 25
5.53×
2.07×
Q3 25
0.70×
Q2 25
1.91×
Q1 25
3.49×
1.83×
Q4 24
3.17×
1.88×
Q3 24
3.55×
0.08×
Q2 24
0.04×
2.07×
Q1 24
3.01×
3.80×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BTU
BTU

Seaborne Metallurgical Mining$305.4M30%
Powder River Basin Mining$300.3M29%
Seaborne Thermal Mining$205.6M20%
Other$182.1M18%
Thermal Coal$28.9M3%

CRUS
CRUS

Audio Products Segment$344.5M59%
High Performance Mixed Signal Products$236.2M41%

Related Comparisons