vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of PEABODY ENERGY CORP (BTU) and GRIFFON CORP (GFF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PEABODY ENERGY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $649.1M, roughly 1.6× GRIFFON CORP). GRIFFON CORP runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 1.2%, a 8.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GRIFFON CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs -9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, PEABODY ENERGY CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.9% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Peabody Energy is an American coal mining company headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri. Its primary business consists of the mining, sale, and distribution of coal, which is purchased for use in electricity generation and steelmaking. Peabody also markets, brokers, and trades coal through offices in China, Australia, and the United States.
Griffon Corporation is a multinational conglomerate headquartered in New York City. It operates as a diversified management and holding company. The company has four subsidiaries: Ames True Temper, ClosetMaid, Clopay Building Products, and CornellCookson. Griffon has been publicly traded since 1961 and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange as a component stock of the S&P SmallCap 600, S&P Composite 1500, and Russell 2000 indices.
BTU vs GFF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0B | $649.1M |
| Net Profit | $12.4M | $64.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | 0.8% | 17.5% |
| Net Margin | 1.2% | 9.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -9.0% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -67.2% | -9.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $1.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $649.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $662.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $890.1M | $613.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $937.0M | $611.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $632.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $659.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $647.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $983.6M | $672.9M |
| Q4 25 | $12.4M | $64.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-70.1M | $43.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-27.6M | $-120.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.4M | $56.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.8M | $70.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.3M | $62.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.4M | $41.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.6M | $64.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 41.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.0% | 18.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | -20.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.0% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | 16.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.9% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.1% | -19.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.1% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.0% | 9.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $1.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.58 | $1.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.23 | $-2.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.27 | $1.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.25 | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.74 | $1.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.42 | $0.84 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.29 | $1.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $575.3M | $95.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $321.2M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.5B | $108.9M |
| Total Assets | $5.8B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.09× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $575.3M | $95.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $603.3M | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $585.9M | $107.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $696.5M | $127.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $700.4M | $152.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $772.9M | $114.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $621.7M | $133.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $855.7M | $123.0M |
| Q4 25 | $321.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $329.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $331.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $323.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $323.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $323.3M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $3.5B | $108.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.5B | $74.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $63.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $214.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $227.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.6B | $224.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $223.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.5B | $202.2M |
| Q4 25 | $5.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.7B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.09× | 22.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.09× | 7.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.09× | 6.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.09× | 6.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.09× | 6.74× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.09× | 7.84× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $68.6M | $107.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $99.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 15.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.53× | 1.66× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $278.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.6M | $107.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.0M | $75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.2M | $123.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $119.9M | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $119.8M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $359.9M | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8M | $122.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $119.0M | $39.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $99.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $62.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $114.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $125.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $107.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $20.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | 5.53× | 1.66× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.49× | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.17× | 2.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.55× | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.04× | 2.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.01× | 0.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BTU
| Seaborne Metallurgical Mining | $305.4M | 30% |
| Powder River Basin Mining | $300.3M | 29% |
| Seaborne Thermal Mining | $205.6M | 20% |
| Other | $182.1M | 18% |
| Thermal Coal | $28.9M | 3% |
GFF
| Consumer And Professional Products | $241.1M | 37% |
| Residential Repairand Remodel | $202.1M | 31% |
| International Excluding North America | $97.8M | 15% |
| Retail | $47.3M | 7% |
| Residential New Construction | $32.5M | 5% |
| Other | $14.2M | 2% |
| Industrial | $14.1M | 2% |
