vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of PEABODY ENERGY CORP (BTU) and GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.7× PEABODY ENERGY CORP). GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. runs the higher net margin — 14.8% vs 1.2%, a 13.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.9% vs -9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, PEABODY ENERGY CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.9% CAGR vs -4.3%).

Peabody Energy is an American coal mining company headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri. Its primary business consists of the mining, sale, and distribution of coal, which is purchased for use in electricity generation and steelmaking. Peabody also markets, brokers, and trades coal through offices in China, Australia, and the United States.

GlobalFoundries Inc. is a multinational semiconductor contract manufacturing and design company domiciled in the Cayman Islands and headquartered in Malta, New York. Created by the divestiture of the manufacturing arm of AMD in March 2009, the company was privately owned by Mubadala Investment Company, a sovereign wealth fund of the United Arab Emirates, until an initial public offering (IPO) in October 2021. Mubadala remains the majority owner of the company with an 82% stake.

BTU vs GFS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GFS
GFS
1.7× larger
GFS
$1.7B
$1.0B
BTU
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GFS
GFS
+6.0% gap
GFS
-2.9%
-9.0%
BTU
Higher net margin
GFS
GFS
13.5% more per $
GFS
14.8%
1.2%
BTU
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
BTU
BTU
Annualised
BTU
1.9%
-4.3%
GFS

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
BTU
BTU
GFS
GFS
Revenue
$1.0B
$1.7B
Net Profit
$12.4M
$249.0M
Gross Margin
24.8%
Operating Margin
0.8%
11.6%
Net Margin
1.2%
14.8%
Revenue YoY
-9.0%
-2.9%
Net Profit YoY
-67.2%
39.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.11
$0.44

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BTU
BTU
GFS
GFS
Q4 25
$1.0B
Q3 25
$1.0B
$1.7B
Q2 25
$890.1M
$1.7B
Q1 25
$937.0M
$1.6B
Q4 24
$1.1B
Q3 24
$1.1B
$1.7B
Q2 24
$1.0B
$1.6B
Q1 24
$983.6M
$1.5B
Net Profit
BTU
BTU
GFS
GFS
Q4 25
$12.4M
Q3 25
$-70.1M
$249.0M
Q2 25
$-27.6M
$228.0M
Q1 25
$34.4M
$211.0M
Q4 24
$37.8M
Q3 24
$101.3M
$178.0M
Q2 24
$199.4M
$155.0M
Q1 24
$39.6M
$134.0M
Gross Margin
BTU
BTU
GFS
GFS
Q4 25
Q3 25
24.8%
Q2 25
24.2%
Q1 25
22.4%
Q4 24
Q3 24
23.8%
Q2 24
24.2%
Q1 24
25.4%
Operating Margin
BTU
BTU
GFS
GFS
Q4 25
0.8%
Q3 25
-8.0%
11.6%
Q2 25
-4.3%
11.6%
Q1 25
3.4%
9.5%
Q4 24
3.6%
Q3 24
11.0%
10.6%
Q2 24
22.4%
9.5%
Q1 24
5.2%
9.5%
Net Margin
BTU
BTU
GFS
GFS
Q4 25
1.2%
Q3 25
-6.9%
14.8%
Q2 25
-3.1%
13.5%
Q1 25
3.7%
13.3%
Q4 24
3.4%
Q3 24
9.3%
10.2%
Q2 24
19.1%
9.5%
Q1 24
4.0%
8.7%
EPS (diluted)
BTU
BTU
GFS
GFS
Q4 25
$0.11
Q3 25
$-0.58
$0.44
Q2 25
$-0.23
$0.41
Q1 25
$0.27
$0.38
Q4 24
$0.25
Q3 24
$0.74
$0.32
Q2 24
$1.42
$0.28
Q1 24
$0.29
$0.24

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BTU
BTU
GFS
GFS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$575.3M
$2.0B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$321.2M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.5B
$11.8B
Total Assets
$5.8B
$16.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.09×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BTU
BTU
GFS
GFS
Q4 25
$575.3M
Q3 25
$603.3M
$2.0B
Q2 25
$585.9M
$1.8B
Q1 25
$696.5M
$1.6B
Q4 24
$700.4M
Q3 24
$772.9M
$2.3B
Q2 24
$621.7M
$2.2B
Q1 24
$855.7M
$2.2B
Total Debt
BTU
BTU
GFS
GFS
Q4 25
$321.2M
Q3 25
$321.8M
Q2 25
$329.2M
Q1 25
$331.2M
Q4 24
$332.3M
Q3 24
$323.7M
Q2 24
$323.2M
Q1 24
$323.3M
Stockholders' Equity
BTU
BTU
GFS
GFS
Q4 25
$3.5B
Q3 25
$3.5B
$11.8B
Q2 25
$3.6B
$11.5B
Q1 25
$3.7B
$11.1B
Q4 24
$3.7B
Q3 24
$3.6B
$11.6B
Q2 24
$3.7B
$11.3B
Q1 24
$3.5B
$11.3B
Total Assets
BTU
BTU
GFS
GFS
Q4 25
$5.8B
Q3 25
$5.7B
$16.7B
Q2 25
$5.8B
$16.8B
Q1 25
$5.8B
$16.5B
Q4 24
$6.0B
Q3 24
$5.9B
$18.1B
Q2 24
$5.9B
Q1 24
$5.7B
Debt / Equity
BTU
BTU
GFS
GFS
Q4 25
0.09×
Q3 25
0.09×
Q2 25
0.09×
Q1 25
0.09×
Q4 24
0.09×
Q3 24
0.09×
Q2 24
0.09×
Q1 24
0.09×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BTU
BTU
GFS
GFS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$68.6M
$595.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
5.53×
2.39×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BTU
BTU
GFS
GFS
Q4 25
$68.6M
Q3 25
$122.0M
$595.0M
Q2 25
$23.2M
$431.0M
Q1 25
$119.9M
$331.0M
Q4 24
$119.8M
Q3 24
$359.9M
$375.0M
Q2 24
$7.8M
$402.0M
Q1 24
$119.0M
$488.0M
Cash Conversion
BTU
BTU
GFS
GFS
Q4 25
5.53×
Q3 25
2.39×
Q2 25
1.89×
Q1 25
3.49×
1.57×
Q4 24
3.17×
Q3 24
3.55×
2.11×
Q2 24
0.04×
2.59×
Q1 24
3.01×
3.64×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BTU
BTU

Seaborne Metallurgical Mining$305.4M30%
Powder River Basin Mining$300.3M29%
Seaborne Thermal Mining$205.6M20%
Other$182.1M18%
Thermal Coal$28.9M3%

GFS
GFS

Smart Mobile Devices$752.0M45%
Automotive$306.0M18%
Home And Industrial Io T$258.0M15%
Goods Or Services Transferred Over Time$198.0M12%
Communications Infrastructure Datacenter$175.0M10%

Related Comparisons