vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of PEABODY ENERGY CORP (BTU) and NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP (NRP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

PEABODY ENERGY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $51.3M, roughly 19.9× NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP). NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS LP runs the higher net margin — 78.5% vs 1.2%, a 77.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PEABODY ENERGY CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-9.0% vs -21.8%). Over the past eight quarters, PEABODY ENERGY CORP's revenue compounded faster (1.9% CAGR vs -8.3%).

Peabody Energy is an American coal mining company headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri. Its primary business consists of the mining, sale, and distribution of coal, which is purchased for use in electricity generation and steelmaking. Peabody also markets, brokers, and trades coal through offices in China, Australia, and the United States.

Natural Resource Partners LP is a U.S.-headquartered master limited partnership that owns, manages and leases mineral reserve interests. Its asset portfolio covers coal, aggregates, industrial minerals and oil & gas, with operations primarily across North America, deriving most revenue from royalties paid by third-party resource extraction operators.

BTU vs NRP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
BTU
BTU
19.9× larger
BTU
$1.0B
$51.3M
NRP
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
BTU
BTU
+12.9% gap
BTU
-9.0%
-21.8%
NRP
Higher net margin
NRP
NRP
77.3% more per $
NRP
78.5%
1.2%
BTU
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
BTU
BTU
Annualised
BTU
1.9%
-8.3%
NRP

Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2025

Metric
BTU
BTU
NRP
NRP
Revenue
$1.0B
$51.3M
Net Profit
$12.4M
$40.3M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
0.8%
83.7%
Net Margin
1.2%
78.5%
Revenue YoY
-9.0%
-21.8%
Net Profit YoY
-67.2%
-28.4%
EPS (diluted)
$0.11

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BTU
BTU
NRP
NRP
Q4 25
$1.0B
Q3 25
$1.0B
Q2 25
$890.1M
Q1 25
$937.0M
$51.3M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$61.8M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$50.4M
Q2 24
$1.0B
$54.6M
Q1 24
$983.6M
$65.6M
Net Profit
BTU
BTU
NRP
NRP
Q4 25
$12.4M
Q3 25
$-70.1M
Q2 25
$-27.6M
Q1 25
$34.4M
$40.3M
Q4 24
$37.8M
$42.8M
Q3 24
$101.3M
$38.6M
Q2 24
$199.4M
$46.1M
Q1 24
$39.6M
$56.2M
Operating Margin
BTU
BTU
NRP
NRP
Q4 25
0.8%
Q3 25
-8.0%
Q2 25
-4.3%
Q1 25
3.4%
83.7%
Q4 24
3.6%
74.9%
Q3 24
11.0%
84.9%
Q2 24
22.4%
92.3%
Q1 24
5.2%
91.0%
Net Margin
BTU
BTU
NRP
NRP
Q4 25
1.2%
Q3 25
-6.9%
Q2 25
-3.1%
Q1 25
3.7%
78.5%
Q4 24
3.4%
69.2%
Q3 24
9.3%
76.6%
Q2 24
19.1%
84.4%
Q1 24
4.0%
85.7%
EPS (diluted)
BTU
BTU
NRP
NRP
Q4 25
$0.11
Q3 25
$-0.58
Q2 25
$-0.23
Q1 25
$0.27
Q4 24
$0.25
Q3 24
$0.74
Q2 24
$1.42
Q1 24
$0.29

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BTU
BTU
NRP
NRP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$575.3M
$30.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$321.2M
$138.8M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.5B
Total Assets
$5.8B
$772.5M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.09×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BTU
BTU
NRP
NRP
Q4 25
$575.3M
Q3 25
$603.3M
Q2 25
$585.9M
Q1 25
$696.5M
$30.9M
Q4 24
$700.4M
$30.4M
Q3 24
$772.9M
$30.9M
Q2 24
$621.7M
$32.3M
Q1 24
$855.7M
$11.0M
Total Debt
BTU
BTU
NRP
NRP
Q4 25
$321.2M
Q3 25
$321.8M
Q2 25
$329.2M
Q1 25
$331.2M
$138.8M
Q4 24
$332.3M
$142.1M
Q3 24
$323.7M
$197.4M
Q2 24
$323.2M
$210.3M
Q1 24
$323.3M
$188.8M
Stockholders' Equity
BTU
BTU
NRP
NRP
Q4 25
$3.5B
Q3 25
$3.5B
Q2 25
$3.6B
Q1 25
$3.7B
Q4 24
$3.7B
Q3 24
$3.6B
Q2 24
$3.7B
Q1 24
$3.5B
Total Assets
BTU
BTU
NRP
NRP
Q4 25
$5.8B
Q3 25
$5.7B
Q2 25
$5.8B
Q1 25
$5.8B
$772.5M
Q4 24
$6.0B
$772.9M
Q3 24
$5.9B
$772.9M
Q2 24
$5.9B
$789.6M
Q1 24
$5.7B
$772.9M
Debt / Equity
BTU
BTU
NRP
NRP
Q4 25
0.09×
Q3 25
0.09×
Q2 25
0.09×
Q1 25
0.09×
Q4 24
0.09×
Q3 24
0.09×
Q2 24
0.09×
Q1 24
0.09×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BTU
BTU
NRP
NRP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$68.6M
$34.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
5.53×
0.86×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BTU
BTU
NRP
NRP
Q4 25
$68.6M
Q3 25
$122.0M
Q2 25
$23.2M
Q1 25
$119.9M
$34.4M
Q4 24
$119.8M
$66.2M
Q3 24
$359.9M
$54.1M
Q2 24
$7.8M
$56.6M
Q1 24
$119.0M
$71.5M
Capex Intensity
BTU
BTU
NRP
NRP
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.0%
Q3 24
0.0%
Q2 24
0.0%
Q1 24
0.0%
Cash Conversion
BTU
BTU
NRP
NRP
Q4 25
5.53×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
3.49×
0.86×
Q4 24
3.17×
1.55×
Q3 24
3.55×
1.40×
Q2 24
0.04×
1.23×
Q1 24
3.01×
1.27×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BTU
BTU

Seaborne Metallurgical Mining$305.4M30%
Powder River Basin Mining$300.3M29%
Seaborne Thermal Mining$205.6M20%
Other$182.1M18%
Thermal Coal$28.9M3%

NRP
NRP

Coal Royalty Revenues$35.5M69%
Soda Ash Segment$4.6M9%
Transportation And Processing Services$4.4M9%
Production Lease Minimum Revenues$2.7M5%
Oil And Gas Royalty Revenues$2.4M5%
Other$1.6M3%

Related Comparisons