vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of PEABODY ENERGY CORP (BTU) and PIPER SANDLER COMPANIES (PIPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

PEABODY ENERGY CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $667.0M, roughly 1.5× PIPER SANDLER COMPANIES). PIPER SANDLER COMPANIES runs the higher net margin — 17.1% vs 1.2%, a 15.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PIPER SANDLER COMPANIES posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.4% vs -9.0%). Over the past eight quarters, PIPER SANDLER COMPANIES's revenue compounded faster (39.2% CAGR vs 1.9%).

Peabody Energy is an American coal mining company headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri. Its primary business consists of the mining, sale, and distribution of coal, which is purchased for use in electricity generation and steelmaking. Peabody also markets, brokers, and trades coal through offices in China, Australia, and the United States.

Piper Sandler Companies is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company, focused on mergers and acquisitions, financial restructuring, public offerings, public finance, institutional brokerage, investment management, and securities research. Through its principal subsidiary, Piper Sandler & Co., the company targets corporations, institutional investors, and public entities.

BTU vs PIPR — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
BTU
BTU
1.5× larger
BTU
$1.0B
$667.0M
PIPR
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PIPR
PIPR
+46.4% gap
PIPR
37.4%
-9.0%
BTU
Higher net margin
PIPR
PIPR
15.9% more per $
PIPR
17.1%
1.2%
BTU
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PIPR
PIPR
Annualised
PIPR
39.2%
1.9%
BTU

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
BTU
BTU
PIPR
PIPR
Revenue
$1.0B
$667.0M
Net Profit
$12.4M
$114.0M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
0.8%
28.3%
Net Margin
1.2%
17.1%
Revenue YoY
-9.0%
37.4%
Net Profit YoY
-67.2%
65.0%
EPS (diluted)
$0.11
$6.41

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BTU
BTU
PIPR
PIPR
Q4 25
$1.0B
$667.0M
Q3 25
$1.0B
$480.1M
Q2 25
$890.1M
$398.6M
Q1 25
$937.0M
$358.6M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$485.4M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$360.9M
Q2 24
$1.0B
$340.8M
Q1 24
$983.6M
$344.4M
Net Profit
BTU
BTU
PIPR
PIPR
Q4 25
$12.4M
$114.0M
Q3 25
$-70.1M
$60.3M
Q2 25
$-27.6M
$42.2M
Q1 25
$34.4M
$64.9M
Q4 24
$37.8M
$69.1M
Q3 24
$101.3M
$34.8M
Q2 24
$199.4M
$34.8M
Q1 24
$39.6M
$42.5M
Operating Margin
BTU
BTU
PIPR
PIPR
Q4 25
0.8%
28.3%
Q3 25
-8.0%
22.4%
Q2 25
-4.3%
12.3%
Q1 25
3.4%
8.2%
Q4 24
3.6%
16.9%
Q3 24
11.0%
15.4%
Q2 24
22.4%
8.3%
Q1 24
5.2%
15.2%
Net Margin
BTU
BTU
PIPR
PIPR
Q4 25
1.2%
17.1%
Q3 25
-6.9%
12.6%
Q2 25
-3.1%
10.6%
Q1 25
3.7%
18.1%
Q4 24
3.4%
14.2%
Q3 24
9.3%
9.6%
Q2 24
19.1%
10.2%
Q1 24
4.0%
12.3%
EPS (diluted)
BTU
BTU
PIPR
PIPR
Q4 25
$0.11
$6.41
Q3 25
$-0.58
$3.38
Q2 25
$-0.23
$2.38
Q1 25
$0.27
$3.65
Q4 24
$0.25
$3.88
Q3 24
$0.74
$1.96
Q2 24
$1.42
$1.97
Q1 24
$0.29
$2.43

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BTU
BTU
PIPR
PIPR
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$575.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$321.2M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.5B
$1.4B
Total Assets
$5.8B
$2.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.09×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BTU
BTU
PIPR
PIPR
Q4 25
$575.3M
Q3 25
$603.3M
Q2 25
$585.9M
Q1 25
$696.5M
Q4 24
$700.4M
Q3 24
$772.9M
Q2 24
$621.7M
Q1 24
$855.7M
Total Debt
BTU
BTU
PIPR
PIPR
Q4 25
$321.2M
Q3 25
$321.8M
Q2 25
$329.2M
Q1 25
$331.2M
Q4 24
$332.3M
Q3 24
$323.7M
Q2 24
$323.2M
Q1 24
$323.3M
Stockholders' Equity
BTU
BTU
PIPR
PIPR
Q4 25
$3.5B
$1.4B
Q3 25
$3.5B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$3.6B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$3.7B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$3.7B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$3.6B
$1.2B
Q2 24
$3.7B
$1.1B
Q1 24
$3.5B
$1.1B
Total Assets
BTU
BTU
PIPR
PIPR
Q4 25
$5.8B
$2.6B
Q3 25
$5.7B
$2.2B
Q2 25
$5.8B
$2.0B
Q1 25
$5.8B
$1.8B
Q4 24
$6.0B
$2.3B
Q3 24
$5.9B
$2.0B
Q2 24
$5.9B
$1.9B
Q1 24
$5.7B
$1.8B
Debt / Equity
BTU
BTU
PIPR
PIPR
Q4 25
0.09×
Q3 25
0.09×
Q2 25
0.09×
Q1 25
0.09×
Q4 24
0.09×
Q3 24
0.09×
Q2 24
0.09×
Q1 24
0.09×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BTU
BTU
PIPR
PIPR
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$68.6M
$729.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
5.53×
6.40×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BTU
BTU
PIPR
PIPR
Q4 25
$68.6M
$729.8M
Q3 25
$122.0M
$31.9M
Q2 25
$23.2M
$32.1M
Q1 25
$119.9M
$-207.2M
Q4 24
$119.8M
$163.8M
Q3 24
$359.9M
$80.1M
Q2 24
$7.8M
$266.5M
Q1 24
$119.0M
$-197.2M
Cash Conversion
BTU
BTU
PIPR
PIPR
Q4 25
5.53×
6.40×
Q3 25
0.53×
Q2 25
0.76×
Q1 25
3.49×
-3.19×
Q4 24
3.17×
2.37×
Q3 24
3.55×
2.30×
Q2 24
0.04×
7.66×
Q1 24
3.01×
-4.64×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BTU
BTU

Seaborne Metallurgical Mining$305.4M30%
Powder River Basin Mining$300.3M29%
Seaborne Thermal Mining$205.6M20%
Other$182.1M18%
Thermal Coal$28.9M3%

PIPR
PIPR

Advisory Services$402.6M60%
Equities Financing$66.7M10%
Equity Salesand Trading$64.2M10%
Fixed Income Salesand Trading$47.9M7%
Other$46.7M7%
Debt Financing$38.9M6%

Related Comparisons