vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL) and CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC. (CLF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.3B vs $2.7B, roughly 1.6× Burlington Stores, Inc.). Burlington Stores, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.9% vs -5.6%, a 9.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Burlington Stores, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.1% vs -0.3%). Burlington Stores, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-109.6M vs $-153.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Burlington Stores, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-6.9% CAGR vs -8.9%).
Burlington, formerly known as Burlington Coat Factory, is an American national off-price retailer, and a division of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation with more than 1,138 stores in 46 states and Puerto Rico, with its corporate headquarters located in Burlington Township, New Jersey. In 2007, it was acquired by Bain Capital in a transaction and in 2008, Tom Kingsbury became president and CEO. The company went public again in 2013. Burlington is the third largest off-price retailer...
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. is an American steel manufacturer based in Cleveland, Ohio. It specializes in the mining, beneficiation, and pelletizing of iron ore, as well as steelmaking, including stamping and tooling. The company is ranked 22nd on the list of steel producers and is the second-largest steel producer in the United States after Nucor. It is the largest flat-rolled steel producer in North America. The company is ranked 221st on the Fortune 500 and 1511th on the Forbes Global 2000.
BURL vs CLF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.7B | $4.3B |
| Net Profit | $104.8M | $-241.0M |
| Gross Margin | 44.2% | -5.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.1% | -7.9% |
| Net Margin | 3.9% | -5.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.1% | -0.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 15.6% | 46.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.63 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1B | $5.2B |
| Q4 25 | $104.8M | $-241.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.2M | $-251.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.8M | $-470.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $260.8M | $-483.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $90.6M | $-447.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.8M | $-242.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.5M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $227.5M | $-67.0M |
| Q4 25 | 44.2% | -5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.7% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.8% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.9% | -8.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.9% | -6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.8% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.5% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.7% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | -7.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | -4.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | -10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.6% | -11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | -10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.0% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | -5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | -9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.0% | -10.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.3% | -1.3% |
| Q4 25 | $1.63 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.47 | $-0.51 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.58 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.03 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.40 | $-0.91 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.15 | $-0.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.22 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.51 | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $584.1M | $57.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.0B | $7.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $6.1B |
| Total Assets | $9.6B | $20.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.32× | 1.19× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $584.1M | $57.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $747.6M | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $371.1M | $61.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $994.7M | $57.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $857.8M | $54.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $659.9M | $39.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $742.3M | $110.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $925.4M | $30.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $8.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $7.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $7.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $3.7B |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $6.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $996.9M | $7.2B |
| Q4 25 | $9.6B | $20.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.3B | $20.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5B | $20.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8B | $20.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.4B | $20.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8B | $16.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7B | $16.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.7B | $17.2B |
| Q4 25 | 1.32× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.40× | 1.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.21× | 1.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.12× | 1.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.35× | 1.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.15× | 0.55× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.20× | 0.49× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.40× | 0.51× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $143.3M | $-13.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-109.6M | $-153.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -4.1% | -3.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 9.3% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.37× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-358.5M | $-1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $143.3M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $179.4M | $-143.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.9M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $543.2M | $-351.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $110.4M | $-472.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $160.4M | $-84.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $49.4M | $519.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $598.5M | $142.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-109.6M | $-153.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-101.0K | $-300.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-438.6M | $-67.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $189.8M | $-503.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-56.2M | $-677.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-35.2M | $-235.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-115.5M | $362.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $410.3M | $-40.0M |
| Q4 25 | -4.1% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.0% | -6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -17.5% | -1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.2% | -15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.4% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.9% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.1% | -0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.29× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.08× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.22× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.63× | 259.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.63× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BURL
Segment breakdown not available.
CLF
| Hot Rolled Steel | $1.1B | 27% |
| Automotive | $1.1B | 27% |
| Steel Producers | $555.0M | 13% |
| Cold Rolled Steel | $530.0M | 12% |
| Other | $409.0M | 9% |
| Stainless And Electrical Steel | $404.0M | 9% |
| Other Businesses | $159.0M | 4% |
