vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) and LSB INDUSTRIES, INC. (LXU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($169.5M vs $113.4M, roughly 1.5× Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.). On growth, LSB INDUSTRIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs 0.6%). Over the past eight quarters, LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (10.0% CAGR vs -16.9%).

Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. is an American energy technology and service provider that is active and has operations in many international markets with its headquarters in Akron, Ohio. Historically, the company is best known for their steam boilers.

Eldridge Industries, LLC is an American holding company headquartered in Miami, with offices in New York City, Greenwich, Connecticut, London, and Beverly Hills. It invests in industries such as insurance, asset management, technology, sports, media, real estate, and the consumer sector.

BW vs LXU — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LXU
LXU
1.5× larger
LXU
$169.5M
$113.4M
BW
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
LXU
LXU
+17.5% gap
LXU
18.2%
0.6%
BW
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
LXU
LXU
Annualised
LXU
10.0%
-16.9%
BW

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
BW
BW
LXU
LXU
Revenue
$113.4M
$169.5M
Net Profit
$19.7M
Gross Margin
20.6%
21.1%
Operating Margin
0.2%
13.7%
Net Margin
11.6%
Revenue YoY
0.6%
18.2%
Net Profit YoY
EPS (diluted)
$0.11

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
BW
BW
LXU
LXU
Q1 26
$169.5M
Q4 25
$113.4M
$165.0M
Q3 25
$149.0M
$155.4M
Q2 25
$144.1M
$151.3M
Q1 25
$181.2M
$143.4M
Q4 24
$112.7M
$134.9M
Q3 24
$152.6M
$109.2M
Q2 24
$151.4M
$140.1M
Net Profit
BW
BW
LXU
LXU
Q1 26
$19.7M
Q4 25
$16.1M
Q3 25
$35.1M
$7.1M
Q2 25
$-58.5M
$3.0M
Q1 25
$-22.0M
$-1.6M
Q4 24
$-63.1M
$-9.1M
Q3 24
$-5.3M
$-25.4M
Q2 24
$25.4M
$9.6M
Gross Margin
BW
BW
LXU
LXU
Q1 26
21.1%
Q4 25
20.6%
25.0%
Q3 25
24.9%
16.4%
Q2 25
30.0%
15.3%
Q1 25
22.1%
10.0%
Q4 24
16.7%
4.5%
Q3 24
23.7%
-7.3%
Q2 24
21.8%
19.6%
Operating Margin
BW
BW
LXU
LXU
Q1 26
13.7%
Q4 25
0.2%
16.2%
Q3 25
4.4%
10.1%
Q2 25
5.6%
6.9%
Q1 25
3.2%
3.1%
Q4 24
-8.1%
-5.0%
Q3 24
1.0%
-22.4%
Q2 24
-2.9%
10.3%
Net Margin
BW
BW
LXU
LXU
Q1 26
11.6%
Q4 25
9.8%
Q3 25
23.5%
4.6%
Q2 25
-40.6%
2.0%
Q1 25
-12.1%
-1.1%
Q4 24
-56.0%
-6.8%
Q3 24
-3.5%
-23.2%
Q2 24
16.8%
6.8%
EPS (diluted)
BW
BW
LXU
LXU
Q1 26
Q4 25
$0.11
$0.22
Q3 25
$0.30
$0.10
Q2 25
$-0.63
$0.04
Q1 25
$-0.26
$-0.02
Q4 24
$-0.73
$-0.13
Q3 24
$-0.10
$-0.35
Q2 24
$0.24
$0.13

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
BW
BW
LXU
LXU
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$89.5M
$181.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$770.0K
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-131.5M
$542.9M
Total Assets
$662.9M
$1.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.00×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
BW
BW
LXU
LXU
Q1 26
$181.7M
Q4 25
$89.5M
$148.5M
Q3 25
$25.2M
$152.0M
Q2 25
$23.4M
$124.9M
Q1 25
$23.5M
$163.5M
Q4 24
$26.9M
$184.2M
Q3 24
$30.6M
$199.3M
Q2 24
$95.5M
$216.3M
Total Debt
BW
BW
LXU
LXU
Q1 26
$770.0K
Q4 25
$440.3M
Q3 25
$447.6M
Q2 25
$446.4M
Q1 25
$478.2M
Q4 24
$476.2M
Q3 24
$476.0M
Q2 24
$479.8M
Stockholders' Equity
BW
BW
LXU
LXU
Q1 26
$542.9M
Q4 25
$-131.5M
$520.0M
Q3 25
$-232.2M
$504.6M
Q2 25
$-309.2M
$495.8M
Q1 25
$-303.0M
$490.6M
Q4 24
$-283.8M
$491.6M
Q3 24
$-203.7M
$499.0M
Q2 24
$-198.9M
$522.8M
Total Assets
BW
BW
LXU
LXU
Q1 26
$1.2B
Q4 25
$662.9M
$1.2B
Q3 25
$657.9M
$1.1B
Q2 25
$703.5M
$1.1B
Q1 25
$719.7M
$1.2B
Q4 24
$727.0M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$804.6M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$849.1M
$1.2B
Debt / Equity
BW
BW
LXU
LXU
Q1 26
0.00×
Q4 25
0.85×
Q3 25
0.89×
Q2 25
0.90×
Q1 25
0.97×
Q4 24
0.97×
Q3 24
0.95×
Q2 24
0.92×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
BW
BW
LXU
LXU
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-3.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-7.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-6.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-85.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
BW
BW
LXU
LXU
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-3.0M
$17.9M
Q3 25
$-32.1M
$52.6M
Q2 25
$-25.3M
$18.2M
Q1 25
$-8.5M
$6.8M
Q4 24
$-22.5M
$4.0M
Q3 24
$-69.5M
$17.1M
Q2 24
$-11.8M
$41.4M
Free Cash Flow
BW
BW
LXU
LXU
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-7.2M
$-3.2M
Q3 25
$-37.6M
$35.6M
Q2 25
$-28.1M
$-315.0K
Q1 25
$-12.8M
$-14.0M
Q4 24
$-23.6M
$-24.2M
Q3 24
$-71.6M
$-13.9M
Q2 24
$-16.4M
$26.6M
FCF Margin
BW
BW
LXU
LXU
Q1 26
Q4 25
-6.3%
-1.9%
Q3 25
-25.3%
22.9%
Q2 25
-19.5%
-0.2%
Q1 25
-7.1%
-9.8%
Q4 24
-20.9%
-18.0%
Q3 24
-46.9%
-12.8%
Q2 24
-10.8%
19.0%
Capex Intensity
BW
BW
LXU
LXU
Q1 26
Q4 25
3.7%
12.8%
Q3 25
3.7%
10.9%
Q2 25
1.9%
12.2%
Q1 25
2.4%
14.5%
Q4 24
1.0%
20.9%
Q3 24
1.4%
28.4%
Q2 24
3.0%
10.5%
Cash Conversion
BW
BW
LXU
LXU
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.11×
Q3 25
-0.92×
7.39×
Q2 25
6.04×
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
-0.46×
4.33×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

BW
BW

Construction$98.8M87%
Other$14.6M13%

LXU
LXU

AN & Nitric Acid$75.3M44%
Urea ammonium nitrate (UAN)$49.2M29%
Ammonia$36.8M22%
Other$8.2M5%

Related Comparisons