vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) and INTERNATIONAL BANCSHARES CORP (IBOC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
INTERNATIONAL BANCSHARES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($217.7M vs $129.0M, roughly 1.7× Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.). INTERNATIONAL BANCSHARES CORP runs the higher net margin — 62.3% vs 1.5%, a 60.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.9% vs 4.5%). INTERNATIONAL BANCSHARES CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($472.9M vs $8.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (16.6% CAGR vs 2.8%).
SLR Consulting is a privately owned international sustainability consultancy with offices in Europe, North America, South America, Australasia, and Africa. In 2019, it reported revenues of £150.8 million. Its purpose is ‘Making Sustainability Happen’, which it achieves through its global team of expert advisors and technicians, who partner with clients to tackle some of the world’s most complex sustainability challenges. Its ultimate owner is Solar Holdings Topco Limited.
International Bancshares Corporation is a bank holding company based in Laredo, Texas whose primary subsidiary is International Bank of Commerce. Through its bank subsidiaries, it has 217 banking offices and 315 automated teller machines serving 88 communities in the U.S. states of Texas and Oklahoma.
BWMN vs IBOC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $129.0M | $217.7M |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | $106.9M |
| Gross Margin | 55.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | 62.8% |
| Net Margin | 1.5% | 62.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.9% | 4.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -66.7% | -7.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $1.71 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $129.0M | $217.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $126.0M | $218.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.1M | $208.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.9M | $198.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.2M | $208.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $113.9M | $211.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.5M | $207.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $94.9M | $205.8M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $106.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.6M | $108.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $100.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $96.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $115.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $771.0K | $99.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.1M | $97.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.6M | $97.3M |
| Q4 25 | 55.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 51.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 50.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 62.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 62.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 60.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 61.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 64.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 60.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.2% | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.8% | 59.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 62.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 49.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | 48.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.5% | 48.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 71.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 47.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.0% | 46.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.6% | 47.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $1.71 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $1.74 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.34 | $1.61 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.11 | $1.56 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.37 | $1.85 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | $1.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | $1.56 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.11 | $1.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.1M | $5.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $57.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $261.1M | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | $579.7M | $16.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.22× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.1M | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2M | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.5M | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.7M | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.7M | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.1M | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.7M | $5.7B |
| Q4 25 | $57.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $261.1M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.8M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $249.6M | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $244.1M | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $246.1M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $243.2M | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.6M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.3M | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $579.7M | $16.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $510.2M | $16.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $538.2M | $16.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $528.7M | $16.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $505.9M | $15.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $497.0M | $15.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.4M | $15.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $420.5M | $15.4B |
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.16× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.4M | $491.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.1M | $472.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.3% | 217.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 8.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.76× | 4.59× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $33.4M | $809.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | $491.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | $115.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3M | $95.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | $140.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $473.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8M | $116.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $107.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5M | $135.4M |
| Q4 25 | $8.1M | $472.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $112.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $91.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0M | $133.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.7M | $459.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6M | $109.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $104.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3M | $128.9M |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 217.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.0% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 44.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | 67.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 220.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 51.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 50.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | 62.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | 3.2% |
| Q4 25 | 4.76× | 4.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.54× | 1.06× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.71× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.02× | 4.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.81× | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.39× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
