vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. (BWMN) and MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. (MMLP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($187.7M vs $129.0M, roughly 1.5× Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.). MARTIN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L.P. runs the higher net margin — 1.7% vs 1.5%, a 0.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.9% vs -2.5%). Bowman Consulting Group Ltd. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.1M vs $-6.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Bowman Consulting Group Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (16.6% CAGR vs 0.8%).
SLR Consulting is a privately owned international sustainability consultancy with offices in Europe, North America, South America, Australasia, and Africa. In 2019, it reported revenues of £150.8 million. Its purpose is ‘Making Sustainability Happen’, which it achieves through its global team of expert advisors and technicians, who partner with clients to tackle some of the world’s most complex sustainability challenges. Its ultimate owner is Solar Holdings Topco Limited.
Martin Midstream Partners L.P. is a U.S.-based midstream energy services provider. It offers storage, transportation, distribution and processing solutions for crude oil, natural gas liquids, refined petroleum products and specialty chemicals, mainly serving customers across North American energy and industrial segments.
BWMN vs MMLP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $129.0M | $187.7M |
| Net Profit | $2.0M | $3.2M |
| Gross Margin | 55.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | 4.1% |
| Net Margin | 1.5% | 1.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.9% | -2.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -66.7% | -37.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $187.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $129.0M | $174.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $126.0M | $168.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $122.1M | $180.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $112.9M | $192.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.2M | $171.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $113.9M | $170.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.5M | $184.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.6M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.7M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $771.0K | $-3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.1M | $3.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 55.0% | 57.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.1% | 55.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.7% | 56.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 51.4% | 53.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.2% | 58.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.4% | 58.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.5% | 58.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.2% | 10.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | -1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | -5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.9% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.5% | -0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | -5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.0% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.34 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.37 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $57.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $261.1M | — |
| Total Assets | $579.7M | $537.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.22× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $23.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $57.6M | $428.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.8M | $441.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.0M | $427.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.4M | $451.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.1M | $437.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.4M | $469.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.8M | $439.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $261.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $261.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $249.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $244.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $246.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $243.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $235.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $537.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $579.7M | $522.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $510.2M | $510.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $538.2M | $515.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $528.7M | $533.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $505.9M | $538.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $497.0M | $554.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $463.4M | $535.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.16× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $8.1M | $-6.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.3% | -3.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.76× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $33.4M | $27.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.4M | $22.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.2M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.3M | $30.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.0M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8M | $-15.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1M | $11.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.1M | $15.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $25.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.7M | $34.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6M | $-25.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $-696.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | -3.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.0% | -4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | -6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 20.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | -15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | -0.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.76× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.54× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.71× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.02× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.81× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BWMN
Segment breakdown not available.
MMLP
| Specialty products | $61.6M | 33% |
| Transportation * | $52.8M | 28% |
| Other | $46.5M | 25% |
| Terminalling and storage * | $22.4M | 12% |
| Sulfur services | $4.4M | 2% |
