vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) and CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BWX Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($860.2M vs $633.7M, roughly 1.4× CENTURY ALUMINUM CO). BWX Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.6% vs 0.3%, a 10.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BWX Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.1% vs 0.4%). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($67.7M vs $50.1M). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 12.4%).
BWX Technologies, Inc. is a company headquartered in Lynchburg, Virginia that supplies nuclear components and fuel internationally.
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
BWXT vs CENX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $860.2M | $633.7M |
| Net Profit | $91.2M | $1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 13.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.4% | 5.2% |
| Net Margin | 10.6% | 0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 26.1% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 20.7% | -96.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.99 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $860.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $885.8M | $633.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $866.3M | $632.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $764.0M | $628.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $682.3M | $633.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.3M | $630.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $672.0M | $539.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $681.5M | $560.8M |
| Q1 26 | $91.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $93.0M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.4M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.5M | $29.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.0M | $45.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.5M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.0M | $-2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.8% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.4% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | 3.6% |
| Q1 26 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | 10.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | -0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | -0.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.99 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.02 | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.89 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.85 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.82 | $0.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.76 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $512.4M | $134.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $805.6M |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.58× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $512.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $499.8M | $134.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.6M | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $40.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.4M | $44.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.1M | $32.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.3M | $41.3M |
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $805.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $741.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $724.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $726.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $694.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $628.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $998.5M | $601.5M |
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | 1.58× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $92.6M | $102.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $50.1M | $67.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.8% | 10.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.9% | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.02× | 57.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $328.1M | $84.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $92.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.0M | $102.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.2M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.0M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.6M | $72.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.9M | $-41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.6M | $20.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.9M | $11.5M |
| Q1 26 | $50.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $56.8M | $67.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.9M | $-18.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.3M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | $51.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $224.4M | $-54.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.7M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.5M | $-5.4M |
| Q1 26 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.1% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.1% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | -1.0% |
| Q1 26 | 4.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 3.0% |
| Q1 26 | 1.02× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.37× | 57.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.74× | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.67× | 2.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.90× | -0.92× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BWXT
Segment breakdown not available.
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
