vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BWX Technologies, Inc. (BWXT) and OPEN TEXT CORP (OTEX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OPEN TEXT CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $885.8M, roughly 1.5× BWX Technologies, Inc.). OPEN TEXT CORP runs the higher net margin — 12.7% vs 10.5%, a 2.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BWX Technologies, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.7% vs -0.6%). OPEN TEXT CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($279.4M vs $56.8M). Over the past eight quarters, BWX Technologies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (21.1% CAGR vs -4.3%).
BWX Technologies, Inc. is a company headquartered in Lynchburg, Virginia that supplies nuclear components and fuel internationally.
Open Text Corporation is a global software company that develops and sells information management software.
BWXT vs OTEX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $885.8M | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $93.0M | $168.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 74.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.4% | 22.0% |
| Net Margin | 10.5% | 12.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 18.7% | -0.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.9% | -26.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.02 | $0.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $885.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $866.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $764.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $682.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $672.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $681.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $604.0M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $93.0M | $168.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $82.1M | $146.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.4M | $28.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.5M | $92.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.0M | $229.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.5M | $84.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.0M | $248.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $68.5M | $98.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 74.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.8% | 72.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 72.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | 71.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 73.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.4% | 71.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.7% | 72.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.6% | 73.0% |
| Q4 25 | 10.4% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 16.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.4% | 15.7% |
| Q4 25 | 10.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.3% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 18.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 11.3% | 6.8% |
| Q4 25 | $1.02 | $0.66 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.89 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.85 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.82 | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | $0.87 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.76 | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.79 | $0.91 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.75 | $0.36 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $499.8M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $6.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $4.0B |
| Total Assets | $4.3B | $13.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.58× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $499.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $79.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $74.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.9M | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.4B |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $998.5M | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $946.2M | $4.1B |
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | $13.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $13.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $13.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1B | $13.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $13.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $13.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $14.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $16.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.55× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.55× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.02× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $127.0M | $318.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $56.8M | $279.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.4% | 21.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.9% | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.37× | 1.90× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $295.3M | $878.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.0M | $318.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.2M | $147.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $159.0M | $158.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.6M | $402.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.9M | $348.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.6M | $-77.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $65.9M | $185.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.0M | $384.7M |
| Q4 25 | $56.8M | $279.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.9M | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $126.3M | $124.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | $373.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $224.4M | $306.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.7M | $-117.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.5M | $145.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.6M | $348.2M |
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 29.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.1% | 23.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.1% | -9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 24.1% |
| Q4 25 | 7.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.0% | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.37× | 1.90× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.74× | 1.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.03× | 5.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.67× | 4.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.90× | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | -0.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.90× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.48× | 3.91× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BWXT
| Nuclear Component Program | $436.4M | 49% |
| Nuclear Manufacturing | $134.8M | 15% |
| Cost Plus Fee | $116.1M | 13% |
| Uranium And Nuclear Services | $103.8M | 12% |
| Commercial Operations | $49.0M | 6% |
| Commercial Operations Segment | $33.7M | 4% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $1.3M | 0% |
OTEX
| Transferred At Point In Time | $184.2M | 14% |
| Cybersecurity Enterprise Product | $174.5M | 13% |
| Business Network Product | $159.8M | 12% |
| Business Network Cloud Services And Subscriptions | $151.4M | 11% |
| Content Cloud Services And Subscriptions | $137.9M | 10% |
| Cybersecurity SMB Consumer Product | $127.6M | 10% |
| Application Delivery Management Product | $120.1M | 9% |
| IT Operations Management Product | $113.3M | 9% |
| Professional Service And Other | $82.5M | 6% |
| Analytics Product | $58.1M | 4% |
| IT Operations Management Cloud Services And Subscriptions | $7.8M | 1% |
