vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Blackstone Inc. (BX) and Celanese Corp (CE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Blackstone Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.3B vs $2.2B, roughly 1.5× Celanese Corp). Blackstone Inc. runs the higher net margin — 36.7% vs 0.6%, a 36.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celanese Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-7.0% vs -77.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Blackstone Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.5% CAGR vs -8.1%).
Blackstone Inc. is an American alternative investment management company based in New York City. It was founded in 1985 as a mergers and acquisitions firm by Peter Peterson and Stephen Schwarzman, who had previously worked together at Lehman Brothers. Blackstone's private equity business has been one of the largest investors in leveraged buyouts in the last three decades, while its real estate business has actively acquired commercial real estate across the globe.
Celanese Corporation, formerly known as Hoechst Celanese, is an American technology and specialty materials company headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is a Fortune 500 corporation. The company is the world's leading producer of acetic acid, producing about 1.95 million tonnes per year, representing approximately 20% of global production. Celanese is also the world's largest producer of vinyl acetate monomer (VAM).
BX vs CE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.3B | $2.2B |
| Net Profit | $1.2B | $14.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 19.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 4.0% |
| Net Margin | 36.7% | 0.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -77.7% | -7.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -76.1% | 100.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.80 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $624.9M | $-1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $764.2M | $199.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $614.9M | $-21.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $703.9M | $-1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $780.8M | $116.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $444.4M | $155.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 54.1% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.8% | -52.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.2% | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.6% | -59.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.4% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.2% | 9.4% |
| Q1 26 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.2% | -56.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.6% | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.7% | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | -80.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.3% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.80 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.29 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.80 | $-12.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.98 | $1.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.80 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.91 | $-17.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.02 | $1.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.58 | $1.41 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.4B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $11.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.5B | $4.0B |
| Total Assets | $45.3B | $21.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.6B | $11.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.1B | $11.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.1B | $12.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6B | $12.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.5B | $11.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.9B | $11.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.8B | $11.1B |
| Q1 26 | $18.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.7B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.4B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.0B | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.2B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | $45.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.7B | $21.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.6B | $22.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.4B | $23.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.3B | $23.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.5B | $22.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.6B | $25.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.6B | $25.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.45× | 2.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.44× | 2.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.45× | 2.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.58× | 2.39× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.40× | 2.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.55× | 1.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.58× | 1.54× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $252.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $168.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 18.00× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $803.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $252.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $447.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $888.5M | $410.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $37.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $161.4M | $494.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $79.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $292.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $168.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $383.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $848.4M | $317.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $-65.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $149.5M | $389.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $-9.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $187.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.0% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.9% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.8% | -2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.0% | 7.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.4% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.05× | 18.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.56× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.80× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.56× | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.61× | 1.88× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BX
| Management and Advisory Fees, Net | $1.9B | 58% |
| Realized | $562.0M | 17% |
| Other | $368.1M | 11% |
| Unrealized | $263.2M | 8% |
| Incentive Fees | $191.8M | 6% |
CE
| Engineered Materials | $1.3B | 58% |
| Acetyl Chain | $940.0M | 43% |
