vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BLACKSTONE MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. (BXMT) and FOSTER L B CO (FSTR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BLACKSTONE MORTGAGE TRUST, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($253.5M vs $160.4M, roughly 1.6× FOSTER L B CO). FOSTER L B CO runs the higher net margin — 1.5% vs -24.1%, a 25.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Blackstone Inc. is an American alternative investment management company based in New York City. It was founded in 1985 as a mergers and acquisitions firm by Peter Peterson and Stephen Schwarzman, who had previously worked together at Lehman Brothers. Blackstone's private equity business has been one of the largest investors in leveraged buyouts in the last three decades, while its real estate business has actively acquired commercial real estate across the globe. Blackstone is also active in...
Foster L B Co. is a U.S.-headquartered industrial manufacturing firm that develops, produces and distributes engineered access solutions, construction components, and rail infrastructure products. It serves commercial construction, transportation, and industrial end markets across North America and selected international regions.
BXMT vs FSTR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $253.5M | $160.4M |
| Net Profit | $-61.1M | $2.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 19.7% |
| Operating Margin | -23.3% | 4.9% |
| Net Margin | -24.1% | 1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 25.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -160.1% | 1098.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.35 | $0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $160.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $138.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $143.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $128.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $137.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $253.5M | $140.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $287.7M | $124.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-242.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.1M | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-123.8M | $4.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 23.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -23.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -42.5% | 4.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.1% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -43.0% | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.27 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.71 | $0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $373.9M | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $42.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.0B | $175.3M |
| Total Assets | $22.6B | $330.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $373.9M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $414.0M | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $42.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $58.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $81.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $82.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $46.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $68.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.2B | $77.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $175.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $174.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $174.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $170.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $178.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $181.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $147.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1B | $144.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $330.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $333.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $349.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $342.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $334.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $344.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.6B | $333.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.3B | $326.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.33× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.92× | 0.54× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $100.2M | $22.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $19.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 12.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.18× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $25.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $29.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-26.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $24.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.2M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $94.6M | $-21.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $26.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-28.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $22.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-24.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -29.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -19.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.70× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.74× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -4.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BXMT
Segment breakdown not available.
FSTR
| Rail Technologies And Services Segment | $98.0M | 61% |
| Over Time Output Method | $26.3M | 16% |
| Services | $19.4M | 12% |
| Rail Technologies Products | $10.0M | 6% |
| Over Time Input Method | $8.3M | 5% |
